h a l f b a k e r yThese statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Existing quantum computers have a real problem: they tend to become incoherent when noise is added. That is, when the temperature of the wrong part rises for any reason. Wouldn't it be great if there were a different way to maintain pairing between particles besides very low temperatures?
At sufficiently
high pressure any material* will exhibit electron pairing. The other word for that is "superconductor". I read about an experiment wherein a 3000 nanometer piece of osmium was compressed at a more than high enough pressure to create pairing. It seems likely that a lithographed circuit made of carbon on an osmium backplane would have this characteristic, if put under sufficient pressure.
Now 3000 nanometers isn't a lot, but at contemporary feature sizes it can make about a 200 by 200 transistor processor. Such a processor could merge traditional processing at superconductive speeds with quantum magic, making a hybrid processor far more powerful than existing quantum computers.
*that has electrons
Cooper pairing works with electrons and, theoretically, with other fermions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_pair
[Voice, May 29 2021]
Computing with pressure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MONIAC
[hippo, May 29 2021]
[link]
|
| |
//tend to become incoherent// hey I resemble that |
|
| |
Muh-muh-my t-t-tee-th-h-h-h ch-ch-ch-at-t-t-er a b-b-
b-bit at the wr-wrong t-t-tem-pera-ture too. |
|
| |
[bigsleep] see the link about electron pairing. It's not molecular bonding, and not directly related to the traditionally known states of matter. |
|
| |
^ today's session has been brought to you by the words under and with and the prefix nano. |
|
| |