h a l f b a k e r yThis is what happens when one confuses "random" with "profound."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
It'll never work. The two images really have to be from precise locations for your brain to understand it as 3-D. However, if the TV signal was meant for this, and was broadcast in a lefteye -righteye -lefteye -righteye order, this would work well. I had a Sega game system years ago with 3-D glasses that did just this using LCD glasses. |
|
|
I made one and it works. If you imagine a plane flying over a landscape and two photos taken a few seconds apart, you will then have a stereoscopic pair. Well, with a fast moving video sequence with parallax effects (such as flying over mountain ranges) you get an incredible sensation of depth - like a continouous stream of stereo pairs. Also, watching motor racing when the cars are coming towards the camera you can see them leap out of the screen. Drama and soaps and stuff do nothing and are flat - but as soon as there's a certain amount of movement your eye actually sees the 3D - and it's not fooling yourself - it's very clear and dynamic 3D as my friends have attested to. The only trouble is that it's flickery - but as a fun project to pass an afternoon it certainly works :) |
|
|
[webchat] is perfectly correct about the mechanism, although there's a better way to see the effect if you have a video capture card. See 'retrofit' link for a project I did in the late 90's. It's best if the camera is tracking horizontally rather than panning, but even with panning the mechanism still works. Best scenes are shot from looking out the side of a moving vehicle such as a train window, or a side view from a helicopter. The opening scenes to Vegas and CSI are good material. |
|
|
won't the cornflakes go everywhere? |
|
|
I'm still trying to figure out how to cut the slits so that they are equidistant from each other about the perimeter yet there are never an aligned pair. |
|
|
this is my favorite idea. |
|
| |