h a l f b a k e r yIt's the thought that counts.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Cancer
Using charcoal and insulin to treat liver cancer | |
[This idea has two sections: use charcoal to stablise liver
failure in liver cancer patients, then use insulin
potentiation therapy to treat the cancer. The details of
the idea are in the link provided below]
Once liver cancer gets to the stage of causing liver
failure, bilirubin and other
toxic waste products normally
filtered by the liver start accumulating in the blood. If
not removed, these can be harmful.
While liver dialysis is possibly the best option to remove
these toxins, this option is not provided to several
patients - for example, those seen as 'terminally ill' in
state-run institutions, or where insurance
does not cover it.
One option is treating liver failure with oral activated
charcoal ingestion. For example, see research letter:
"Liver Failure in Protoporphyria: Long-Term Treatment
With Oral Charcoal" in link. That patient about received
40 gm of activated charcoal per day.
With the impact of liver failure mitigated, Insulin
Potentiation Therapy could be used to treat
liver cancer. A forum thread in the link describes a case
of successful treatment of inoperable
Cholangiocarcinoma (cancer of the bile ducts in the liver)
with Insulin Potentiation Therapy. The protocol for
IPT is described in several patents and websites (see
link)
Using charcoal and insulin to treat liver cancer
https://docs.google...27IujI8nuo&hl=en_US Using activated charcoal to mitigate the effect of liver failure, allowing for treatment of liver cancer with insulin potentiation therapy [sonam, May 29 2011]
[sonam]'s link as a link
http://www.jpeds.co...64)80548-5/abstract no charge for this service [po, May 31 2011]
[link]
|
|
1) You can insert links by clicking the [link] link,
which you'll find just below the text of your idea. |
|
|
2) In the paper you cite, is charcoal a treatment
for liver failure, or is it a treatment for *porphyria*
(one particular cause of liver failure)? Looks like
the latter, to me. Stipulate, arguendo, that liver
failure causes symptoms primarily through the
accumulation of toxins in the blood. This is a
large, and incompletely characterized collection
of chemicals, not all of which will be effectively
removed from the body by activated charcoal in
the lumen of the gut. Porphyrins: yes, other
molecules: probably
not. |
|
|
3) Nonetheless this idea is better than nothing,
e.g. for hoi polloi in state-run health institutions.
The usual technique is to induce
diarrhea, with an osmotic laxative, traditionally
lactulose. |
|
|
The liver is a giver. Meaning that it makes important stuff. Charcoal is not one of these things and so feeding people charcoal does not address that aspect of liver failure. |
|
|
Charcoal does not bind bilirubin or other blood breakdown products as those things are in the blood and the charcoal is in the gut. |
|
|
Charcoal does not help against hepatic encepalopathy because presumably whatever lack or excess causes it, it is in the blood. |
|
|
Insulin potentiated chemotherapy is an interesting idea but has not been developed because of the lack of money to be made, and consequent lack of sponsors interested in funding the clinical trials necessary to show it if brings any improvement to standard chemo. Generally IPT is the province of laetrille merchants and other snake oil salesman who do not stand to profit from rigorous clinical trials of their approaches. |
|
|
Link did not work for me. |
|
|
Everyone - lets keep our language simple. This is
halfbakery after all :). |
|
|
Orally ingested charcoal _is_ effective reducing
blood bilirubin in newborns. See (remove spaces
from URL):
http://www.jpeds.com/
article/S0022-3476(64)80548-5/
abstract |
|
|
IPT has been beneficial in the real world cases and
lab studies have shown that it increases chemo's
effectiveness by upto 10000 times. However, it
has not attracted much research. Perhaps this is
because there isn't much profit to be made from
insulin and also because it requires careful medical
supervision during administration to bring the
patient safely in and out of the hypoglycemic (low
blood sugar) state. |
|
|
Though you obviously have good intentions, you
should change the title a bit, as the first impression
is that this idea is in bad taste. |
|
| |