h a l f b a k e r yWe have a low common denominator: 2
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Since they refuse to adapt a real point scoring system, I say they eliminate the confusion (when my son asks me how many points Venus has, I have to go into this long, only-serious-fans-allowed lecture about how they score the friggin thing) by adapting totally meaningless names for the score levels.
Instead of Love-15-30-40-game, we'll call them Dingy-Magma-Toast-Buzzsaw-Cream Puff. Or something. That way when my son asks, "What's the score?" I can say fun things like "Cream Puff-Dingy".
[link]
|
| |
"Toast" should be zero, that way we could say something like "Seles was toast." |
|
| |
Croissant>Fishbone would be my pick for win without points against |
|
| |
But keep the win-by-2 business. I've always liked that aspect of tennis. It should be used in other sports. |
|
| |
(gt! long temps, aucun voyez.) |
|
| |
How about 'croissant' instead of 'advantage'. |
|
| |
(I couldn't stay away forever, waugsqueke... could I?) |
|
| |
you just try getting out, swami my lad <g> |
|
| |
[ravenswood] I love when they do that! |
|
| |
At work the other day, out of idle curiosity (or complete boredom perhaps) I read the introduction to a textbook about commodities trading that started out with an analogy saying that commodities trading *seems* complicated but is actually as simple and strightfowrd as greeting someone on the street before launching into the most utterly abstruse, arcane and downright impenetrable screed I can recall reading. |
|
| |
I liked extreme and unintentional irony. |
|
| |
<lee evans> Fifteen? Sod off!One!! </lee evans> |
|
| |