h a l f b a k e r yIt's not a thing. It will be a thing.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
could you poss re-write this to make sense of this +1 |
|
|
I've ridden such a bike. It was built by a friend of mine. Rather than extra gears, it has two rear wheels, one above the other, in tyre to tyre contact. The wheel configuration is thus: |
|
|
The upper rear wheel and the bottom bracket are on back-to-front, so the chain and sprockets are on the left. Thus, pedalling backwards causes the upper wheel to rotate backwards, which in turn causes the lower wheel to turn forwards. |
|
|
Those world records are truly amazing... Some club cyclists would be trying not to be embarrased by someone passing by like this. |
|
|
I like the use of the word "dsitance" to illustrate the principle of the idea. [+] |
|
|
spider mother, instead of using 2 tires you could simply use 2 gears, Just more mechanically efficient. |
|
|
Absolutely. The simplest method is simply to cross the chain over in the middle - so the chain is like an infinity symbol. |
|
|
This one had the extra wheel not for efficiency, but for sheer outlandishness. |
|
|
(BTW, didn't you want less dsitance to get the same amount of exercise? Isn't mechanical efficiency counter to that?) |
|
|
//How do you even get started riding something like this!?// One foot on a pedal (a bit of a stretch); scoot along with the other to get some speed; quickly, in one move, stand up and swing leg over; start pedalling. The most difficult part is to convince yourself to do something so silly. It's actually surprisingly easy. |
|
|
I am really quite taken with the retrodirect setup. Now thinking hard about starting to collect pieces... |
|
|
It would sound like you are free-wheeling in both directions! |
|
| |