h a l f b a k e r yAlmost as great as sliced bread.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Yep, this is another in the "not earth-shattering" series of ideas.
Automatic shut-off coffee makers are available, but they don't make much sense. They operate on a timer, which shuts the unit off after 60 or 120 minutes or whatever. Sure, that will prevent a meltdown or a dry boil, but
only if you're already starting with a pretty full pot of joe. You could put an almost-empty pot on the heater base and it would cook dry within the time allotted.
Instead, put a weight sensor in the base of the unit. Set the threshhold weight to be the pot plus, say, 1/2 cup fluid. If the fluid level gets too low, the switch goes to the off position.
This would work for either the home coffee maker (auto drip type of thing) or for the industrial strength restaurant style.
Yes, I've google searched. All I've found are the timed shut-off type. No weight-based ones.
[link]
|
| |
genius, but I wish it exploded or something <help - hanging around with Afro does one no good at all> |
|
| |
Croissant. This way my Mom can stop calling me from
work and telling me to make sure she turned the coffee
machine off. And the smokeless ashtray, that really
doesn't work. |
|
| |
While "not-earh-shattering" this idea is an infinite improvement over the current design. Auto-shut off has been around for years, yet no one ever before proposed this far superior engineering of it. That makes you a "non-linear" thinker, and the recipient of a croissant. |
|
| |
If non-linear thinking is all it takes to get a croissant around here... |
|
| |
can you do non-linear, can you, can you? go on then |
|
| |
I likey but wouldn't the machine shut off every time you grabbed the pot? |
|
| |
Good, but perhaps it might work better if it detected the slight rise in temperature that is bound to occour when the liquid coffee quits moderating the temperature. Perhaps an extra circuit that keeps up with the cycle rate of the thermostat. |
|
| |
surely it just needs to measure the rate of change of weight ? (it should only do this once the liquid is boiling however, otherwise it'll never even warm up). nice work [1/4]Ber |
|
| |
Boiling? Your coffee maker must run a good deal warmer than mine. |
|
| |
Since the pot has to start out emtpy, it would be simplest to use a temperature sensor, or to put the weight sensor under the entirety of the machine. |
|
| |
I tend to spill coffee on the hot plate, which could theoretically for a pretty thick coating after a while. A temperature sensor would probably cut out sooner in this situation, which would be annoying but safer. |
|
| |
Given a fixed heating power, the smaller the volume of fluid in the pot, the higher the equilibrium temperature achieved. For this reason I too favour a temperature sensor. |
|
| |