h a l f b a k e r yA few slices short of a loaf.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Maybe there could be scratch paper on the screen (with a pencil tool) and you could scribble your notes on the screen using the mouse and then drag/drop onto the calculator. (Or type them, I guess) |
|
|
I'm voting in favour of this because it's a simple solution... who wants to use a bloody spread sheet every time they want to make a few grand total calculations that involve bringing a series of sub-totals forward? |
|
|
This could easily be baked as a feature of a calculator app on a cellphone.
Once the cellphone finally replaces the calculator, autocomplete would be a standard feature. |
|
|
Yes, i like [+]. Concerning the mobile/cellphone comment, the calculator apps i've used on them are shockingly awful. It amazes me that they have something like video messaging at the same time as a calculator facility which could be beaten by an early twentieth century mechanical device. Having said that, i also think the calculator app is a special case of non-feature creep. The more features of a particular kind a calculator has, the closer it gets to being a stored-program computer. For instance, i can imagine a calculator which implements APL. What would that make it? |
|
|
This is an idea whose time has come; it could now be implemented on graphing calculators, which in the past did not possess enough memory. |
|
|
I was playing with my nephew's claculator (yes, I know) the other day, a Casio, and I think it may have had such a function - It certainly had multiple "lines" you could scroll through, and I think you could cut and paste results |
|
|
//who wants to use a bloody spread sheet every time they want to make a few grand total calculations that involve bringing a series of sub-totals forward?// |
|
|
You could install some really old office/spreadsheet program. I've got Microsoft Works 2 somewhere and it is only a couple of megabytes in size. That means a nice quick load when you want to use it. |
|
|
For more basic applications like Calculator, I do agree that they should store more than one number. As should real calculators. It's not like we can't afford the 8 bytes per number they take up. |
|
|
What you want is a TI. 84, 89, doesn't matter - every middle school-college student has one within arm's reach. |
|
|
I can do one better, [bad jim], Lotus 1-2-3 fits on a 5Œ" floppy. And it still runs. |
|
| |