Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Guitar Hero: 4'33"

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


                 

Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register. Please log in or create an account.

Ask70MillionPeople.com

Imagine a website where we crowdsource the generation of a perfect question for everybody in the country and expect a long answer from it. We can crowdfund the reward for answering and the answer shall be public for research purposes
 
(+1, -1)
  [vote for,
against]

I am curious what information is valuable even from an average person and collecting it for storage for future generations. You could pay everyone £1 for taking part.

What would your question be for everyone?

Like a census but for useful questions.

chronological, Aug 24 2022

[link]






       //the answer shall be public for research purposes//   

       So, 42, obviously.
pertinax, Aug 24 2022
  

       Why?
pocmloc, Aug 25 2022
  

       Because "a perfect question" has not been defined. And a crowd-sourced "perfect question" is unlikely to make much more sense than "What is the ultimate answer to life, the universe and everything?"
pertinax, Aug 25 2022
  

       No you misunderstand. I was suggesting the perfect question.
pocmloc, Aug 25 2022
  

       Ah, of course. Here is your £1* share of the crowd-sourced £70m. Don't spend it all at once.   

       *adjusted by a reasonable administration and handling fee of £1.
pertinax, Aug 25 2022
  

       There used to be a poll site called ask500people.com which tanked from lack of interest. They never had anywhere near 500 people responding.
tatterdemalion, Aug 29 2022
  

       Our own model, "ask a handful of weird, grumpy people" is clearly superior.
pertinax, Aug 29 2022
  

       We are at least 2 decades late for using internet as direct democracy. What should be happening is: 1) People put their concept to referendum. 2) If a critical mass of people (20,000? More?) upvote the idea, then it goes to nationwide referendum. At the federal level, people would have to vote, at most, once or twice a day.   

       I recently met another in a long line of Russian idiots, but this one told me that Russians "did not need" democracy. Fine, I said, but what can it hurt to have the system I've described, if only to check whether they secretly crave democracy anyway?   

       The nice thing about the internet is that no one has to ask the government if people can put up democratic polls yet.
4and20, Aug 31 2022
  
      
[annotate]
  


 

back: main index

business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle