h a l f b a k e r yStill more entertaining than cricket.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
//the answer shall be public for research purposes// |
|
| |
Because "a perfect question" has not been defined. And a crowd-sourced "perfect question" is unlikely to make much more sense than "What is the ultimate answer to life, the universe and everything?" |
|
| |
No you misunderstand. I was suggesting the perfect question. |
|
| |
Ah, of course. Here is your £1* share of the crowd-sourced £70m. Don't spend it all at once. |
|
| |
*adjusted by a reasonable administration and handling fee of £1. |
|
| |
There used to be a poll site called ask500people.com which tanked from lack of interest. They never had anywhere near 500 people responding. |
|
| |
Our own model, "ask a handful of weird, grumpy people" is clearly superior. |
|
| |
We are at least 2 decades late for using internet as direct democracy. What should be happening is: 1) People put their concept to referendum. 2) If a critical mass of people (20,000? More?) upvote the idea, then it goes to nationwide referendum. At the federal level, people would have to vote, at most, once or twice a day. |
|
| |
I recently met another in a long line of Russian idiots, but this one told me that Russians "did not need" democracy. Fine, I said, but what can it hurt to have the system I've described, if only to check whether they secretly crave democracy anyway? |
|
| |
The nice thing about the internet is that no one has to ask the government if people can put up democratic polls yet. |
|
| |