h a l f b a k e r yWhere life imitates science.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Say words question you take. Put give too much answer very very.
Advertisement same same good very I give. Not waste.
Too much benefit is good. I take much information inside. Then, insufficient good very. I come back have same same. Learn speech not necessary even construct. They five.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
I too five. We have so much in common. |
|
|
baked on most instruction leaflets I come across. |
|
|
So if I'm reading this idea right it's "gibberish is funny ha ha, so make a chatbot that speaks gibberish" Am I reading this idea right? |
|
|
I don't think it's quite gibberish, or not necessarily at least. I'm pretty sure linguists can predict the type of errors and mispronunciations someone will make in a second language based on vocal and grammatical habits from their first language. Classic ones are mixing up genders when coming from a language that doesn't use gendered pronouns. Or confusing the sound of L and R when coming from a language that don't distinguish the sounds. |
|
|
But of course not all mistakes are predictable, so some randomness (gibberish) should be sprinkled in. I knew a Chinese real estate agent in the US who somehow learned the word "sewage" incorrectly and would constantly refer to it as "sausage". I couldn't correct him without laughing so I just let it be. |
|
|
All your base are belong to us. |
|
|
Thanks [a1]. Better in Yodish, it sounds |
|
| |