h a l f b a k e r yFunny peculiar.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Despite being far and away the most popular sport
throughout the
world, soccer has never really caught on in the U.S as a
spectator sport.
But looking at the sports that ARE popular here, it's not
hard to see
why: Americans like fast-paced, high-scoring games.
The idea of an
hour and
a half long match that ends 0-0, only to be
decided in a
shootout simply doesn't send the heart of most Yanks
racing.
Accordingly, here are some suggestions to bring the
game more in line
with American tastes:
1) Reduce the size of the pitch drastically. No more than
150'x100'.
That's about a quarter of the size of a standard pitch.
2) Accordingly, reduce the number of players to, say, 6
on 6.
3) Do away with goalkeepers entirely.
4) Adjust the scoring so that each goal is worth 6 points,
plus an
additional 3 points if kicked from outside the penalty
area.
5) Play begins with a drop ball instead of a kick-off, to
make things
more exciting from the get-go.
6) Eliminate free kicks. The restart following any foul is
a drop ball at
the penalty mark in the half of the field of the player
who committed
the foul.
7) Eliminate penalty kicks as well. A foul by a
defending team within
their own penalty area results in 4 points being
awarded to the
attackers, in addition to the drop ball restart specified
in (6).
8) Tie games (which would be a much rarer occurrence)
are decided by
two regular overtime periods, followed by as many
sudden death
overtime periods as necessary.
9) Eliminate the offside rule. Nobody really understands
it anyway.
These changes are designed to increase the pace and
scoring of the
game, without fundamentally changing the way soccer is
played.
Brian Phillips (an American) writes about the boredom of football
http://www.grantlan...lips-soccer-boredom I have almost definitely linked to this elsewhere on the halfbakery [calum, Nov 21 2012]
That Bergkamp goal
http://www.youtube....watch?v=XsZkCFoqSBs ooh baby [calum, Nov 21 2012]
Real soccer fan
http://www.youtube....watch?v=Zeu4BrOkZF0 100% real. I swear. Warning: offensive lenguaje [piluso, Nov 21 2012]
Fives
http://en.wikipedia...ive-a-side_football [calum, Nov 22 2012]
Futsal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futsal one of the great things about the simplicity of soccer is that it makes this sort of variation and adaptation possible [calum, Nov 22 2012]
[link]
|
|
Ooooh, ooooh, do golf next! |
|
|
//Ooooh, ooooh, do golf next!// |
|
|
Dammit, Jim, I'm a Halfbaker, not a miracle worker!
|
|
|
10) Lifetime ban for fans who refer to a sports team they don't actually play for using the first person plural. |
|
|
I think that's strictly a European thing. It doesn't actually
happen
all that often, if ever, in the States. I think people would
just look at you funny if you did that here. The only
possible exception would be for students and alumni of
colleges when referring to their school's team, but that's at
least semi-legitimate. |
|
|
Golf has already been done, look up "crazy golf". For some reason, however, the international tournaments are somewhat under-reported in the mainstream media. |
|
|
// yellow 4 points, red - 6 points// That would make the game very interesting, getting 4 points for a Yellow card and -6 points for a Red card. Players would be incentivised to behave badly, but not too badly. |
|
|
This is missing (a) a windmill, (b) explosions and (c) sufficient ambition in the points mechanism. |
|
|
On (c) we need at least
10,000 for a goal,
100 points being awarded for each completed pass provided said pass is (i) forward and (ii) made within 3 seconds of receiving the ball, 1,000 points for hitting the crossbar or post, 1,000 for forcing the goalie into a save (with the defending team getting 1,000 for the save),
yes yes by all means penalise foul play but there should also be points awarded for successful completion of morally suspect play/actions (cf John Terry) that are not picked up by the referee and his/her assistants
5,000 for comical chants by supporters
50,000 points per game where the pies are good
100,000 for the Anfield Rap. |
|
|
...and after every 100 kicks, the ball should explode and be replaced by a new ball. |
|
|
//Americans like fast-paced, high-scoring games//
Hmm! Let's talk baseball, shall we? |
|
|
The offside rule is to stop boring goal-hanging.
Without it, the team with the ball just punt it as
hard as they can to the striker who's on his own with
the keeper. Offside rule stays, because there's a
reason for it. |
|
|
// Let's talk baseball, shall we? // |
|
|
"If you modify it, they will come
" |
|
|
// after every 100 kicks, the ball should explode// Yes, but not maimingly, more like the classic Terry's Chocolate Orange segmentisation, with a small puff of coloured smoke and snake-shaped bell-ended streamers firing out, nearby mariachi band hopped up on goofballs going bananas with the mexican hat dance/Advance Australia Fair/Nothing Compares 2 U u.s.w. each time this happens. |
|
|
What I would also like is:
if each time the ball is kicked or hits the post a large metallic clanging bell noise rings out,
long periods of ballflight are soundtracked by doodlebug noises,
MIDI of classic American circus music and/or Looney Tunes theme blarinng out of stadium speakers upon team A getting the b. in the o.b. (all so that Bergkamp's 1998 goal against Argentina* runs clang nyeeeeooowwww clang clang clang doodle oodle oodle ning-ning-ning-nong da da da da da daaaa). |
|
|
In short, what I think the American market needs is a game that looks and sounds like GIANT MEAT PINBALL. |
|
|
*a thing of wonder which justifies as many clogging 0-0 draws away to Stoke as you could imagine. |
|
|
The American Soccer will be massive if they understand the basics of soccer:
- It's a good excuse for stay away your wife some hours
- It's a license to insult people loudly: rival players, rival fans, your team players, coach and more !
- Extreme fans can initiate serious rampages, without legal consecuences
- You can forget for a while you live in a civilization.
- Also applies if you watch the matchs on tv (except your wife away) ! see [link] |
|
|
There must be something wrong with a sport that even France can be good at. |
|
|
I think I know the answer. What Americans want in their sports are suspense and drama. To do this, you need to add dramatic pauses in some fashion or other. The problem with soccer is that the drama to the game is not self-evident. American Football has an achievable but difficult goal every 10 yard drive. Soccer needs something similar. |
|
|
Noises? Sure. We have marching bands that add their own soundtracks sometimes for that. Just keep that wretched vuvuzela away. |
|
|
Penalty kicks: please do away with these. When the game is over, the game is over. Simply doing this will add a modicum of drama by reintroducing the time element. Penalty kick-driven games are simply like watching men wander around a field for 90 minutes and then determining the winner by adding a round of batting practice. |
|
|
When so many games end in 0-0, it seems the rules need some adjustment. |
|
|
American sports need natural breaks in action to allow commercials to be broadcast. I propose that American Rules Soccer is played to a musical sountrack which is periodically stopped, at which time all players must 'freeze' (like in the children's party game). While this happens, commercials are aired. After this, the music starts again and play can resume. |
|
|
These require action first, which is missing from soccer. |
|
|
//American sports need natural breaks in action//
Cycling should be popular then. Professional cyclists quite often take natural breaks in the midst of the action. |
|
|
//The offside rule is to stop boring goal-hanging. Without
it, the team with the ball just punt it as hard as they can to
the striker who's on his own with the keeper. Offside rule
stays, because there's a reason for it.// |
|
|
That's the point. What Europeans consider boringnamely,
mindless, rapid fire scoringAmericans consider exciting.
Eliminating the offside rule would increase the number of
goals scored, especially since there wouldn't be any
keeper. Anyway, on a smaller field with fewer players and
no keepers, I don't think it's as necessary. The action is
likely to move so rapidly that having a man just waiting for
an opening to receive a pass is likely a poor strategy,
especially when it means losing a sixth of your team where
he action is happening. Maybe even make it 5 on 5, to
make goal hanging an even worse strategy. |
|
|
//Hmm! Let's talk baseball, shall we?// |
|
|
Yeah, I can't really explain that one, except to suggest that
baseball isn't really a sport as much as a way for closeted
statistics nerds to identify each other in public. |
|
|
tbh, if you want fast, physical football, getchyerself to a five-a-sides place and get stuck in. |
|
|
//tbh, if you want fast, physical football, getchyerself to a five-a-sides place and get stuck in.//
For "get stuck in" read "start looking like a cardiac victime after 150 seconds" |
|
|
Everyone here who dislikes soccer yet doesn't understand
one or all of the following: |
|
|
-offsides rules
-the appeal of low-scoring, 1 point per goal games
-the danger of overcomplicating the rules
-penalty shots and shoot-outs
-how a scoreless period, half, or game can be edge-of-
your-seat exciting
|
|
|
Needs to watch ice hockey. Just one game, from the stands
(it's not the same on TV). Try to sit next somebody
knowledgeable or, failing that, somebody wearing fewer
than three items of team paraphernalia. |
|
|
(Sorry. That's practically an in-joke among soccer referees.) |
|
|
No need to apologize. Watch out for the puck. |
|
|
The difference between American and English is that
the English take a photograph and then enlarge it while
the Americans shoot a picture and then blow it up. |
|
|
This supports my suspicion that hockey originated
from soccer by bored Canadians waiting for the ball
to thaw. |
|
| |