h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Previews appear in stereoscopic LCD monitors. A poloroid version could print out either a dual stereographic set of images, or an old-school red and blue tinted 3D photo.
http://www.sharpert...y.com/3dlaptop.html
3D laptop link [cloudface, Dec 14 2004]
3D cameras
http://www.stereosc...oncepts/camera.html
Fairly well baked [krelnik, Dec 14 2004]
Make Your Own Anaglyphs
http://features.eng...y/1253716493759137/
How to make your 2 pictures into one red-blue 3D image [Acme, Feb 01 2005]
[link]
|
| |
Cool. Finally a camera for your Sharp
RD3d--the 3d laptop. Maybe Sharp will
build one as an accessory... |
|
| |
I have one of those 3d "nishica" cameras that came out about 9 years ago. it has 4 lenses and takes four simultanious picts in the space of two film frames. "lenticular" prints were made from that, but were very expensive to develope. I sent the film in to nishica, with a check, and heard nothing for two years. I then was contacted by another company who said that nishica was out of business, and they had bought up their undeveloped film (some of it was 5 years old) so i finaly got the picts, and they were ok, but not quite worth all that money. |
|
| |
Then, years later i bought a antique reproduction stereo scope, to go with a bunch of antique slides that a great aunt had given me (her viewer had been broken or lost years ago). I dug out the negs from the nishica, had some regular prints made, and glued the 2 print from the first and fourth lens of each set, which were about as far apart as your eyes, to cardboard. now i have stereo slides of myself, and my sisters with their husbands. their kids got a big kick out of seeing the slides. |
|
| |
well anyhow. i think this idea gets a croisant, I love 3d, and think this will work. |
|
| |
The reason the cameras need to be much further appart when viewing things other than close-ups has to do with viewed size versus actual size. If I photograph a 100' tall building from a distance of 500' and want to make a 3d poster from it, I want the poster to look like a 3d //miniature// of the building. If the poster is supposed to look like a 1' tall model of a 100' building, then the eye spacing when photographing the original should be magnified 100-fold to compensate for the reduction in size. |
|
| |