h a l f b a k e r yNot so much a thought experiment as a single neuron misfire.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
You'd need many more stepper motors (to push out
(or not) the material here but not there) |
|
|
I'd think, with micromachines, you could create a
massively parallel set of steppers to control I/O
along that one dimension. |
|
|
And, are you proposing to keep it 1 filament per
nozzle? (too many hookups/spools needed), or 1
filament goes into a shared fluid reservoir after pre-
heating? |
|
|
Managing the pressure drops & fluid flow would be
challenging as well. (Esp. if you quickly oscillate
between drawing a full solid line then point, then
line). |
|
|
And, these things clog, & need maintenance. |
|
|
Sorry if I'm taking this HB idea too seriously. I have a
3D Makerbot & it's wonderful but breaks down all the
time. |
|
|
// You'd need many more stepper motors // |
|
|
Isn't the point to replace the stepper motor-driven
extruder(s) with micro-pumps or heaters like in an
inkjet or bubble jet printer? |
|
|
I've taken apart *many* printers (the kind that print
images and text on paper), a few of which were the
dye sublimation type. I think one of those could be
adapted to 3D printing. They typically take blocks of
solid ink, which they melt/sublimate and deposit on
the paper. Just run the same paper through multiple
times and you've got 2.5D printing. Mount the print
head on a gantry and it's a 3D printer. |
|
| |