h a l f b a k e r yYou think: Aha! We go: ha, ha.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Construct a large pressurized enclosure in orbit. Obtain 5 dozen willing participants of appropriate genders. Explain the structure of the Carbon-60 molecule.
Observe as participants organize themselves into a buckyfuck.
applet showing C60 structure
http://jcrystal.com...POLYHEDRA/p_00.html
[egnor, Oct 04 2004]
Buckyball image
http://www.washingt...mages/buckyball.jpg
[FloridaManatee, Oct 04 2004]
Another buckyball
http://www.cnt-net....mages/buckyball.gif
show me what constitutes a "person"? [benlevi7, Oct 04 2004]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
The category's funny at least... |
|
| |
The geometry seems a little hard to manage. As I understand C60, each carbon atom is connected to three others in a nearly equilateral arrangement. |
|
| |
Maybe you can hire FarmerJohn to draw us a picture? Ahem. |
|
| |
Geez guys, join the 21st century. You are correct to deduce that a completely heterosexual buckyball is impossible. |
|
| |
However, it is obvious that if you want to populate the entire sphere with homosexuals, what is proposed can work. If you want a (partially) heterosexual buckyball, you'll have to have at least a few bisexuals in the mix. Just doodling on a buckyball diagram here, it seems to me that 10 bisexual males and 10 bisexual females would do the trick. So 1/3 of the people in the ball would be bisexual, the other 2/3 would be heterosexual. |
|
| |
I was more concerned with physical orientation than sexual orientation. |
|
| |
Could the physical orientation problem be fixed if you used centaurs? |
|
| |
I've read that this can end up being quite messy. |
|
| |
I never was good at science but, I'll help clean up the mess, if I can help make it. When does the space shuttle depart ? ? What is bisexual male and/or bisexual female aren't they/we about the samething?
Shoot I guess I'm not any good at biology either. |
|
| |
so its not a recipe then? I require a diagram. |
|
| |
hay guys join the milleneim , what you need is babylotion and the game twister and you could get more than one shape for half the mess. |
|
| |
p.s. isn't gravity wonderfull!!!!!! |
|
| |
Yah , ramcrow what goes up must come down |
|
| |
Yes, each individual must have 3 bonds. Assuming a bond must comprise of a inny and an outy bit, we must assume all must be female. Except me. In the middle. |
|
| |
Yes, this must be demonstrated. We need buckyballs composed of nubile space lesbians. |
|
| |
You're looking at it all wrong. Visualize the participants as the bonds, not as the vertices. Then each participant interacts with two others at the head connection, and two others at the groin connection. Each spreads legs along the bodies of the participants at the groin connection, both to facilitate access and to appropriately complete the resulting image. Of course, you'd have to increase the number of participants from 60 to 90, and the determination of the appropriate sexual orientation mix is left as an exercise to the discerning reader. |
|
| |
could each bond be a person? think oral... |
|
| |
Seems like an aww-fuck lotta work to knock boots. I guess I am old-fashioned, but where is the enjoyment in all of this? The idea seems to focus on the mechanics of sex. What do you do for foreplay, or postplay? I'll pass, thank you. [-] |
|
| |
an orgy is an anything goes, uninhibited type of thing. this on the other hand is so structured, that it sounds more like a ritual-tantric sex activity. |
|
| |
But a zero gravity orgy? Cool. |
|
| |
I'm more interested in the possibility, suggested by the title, of an orgy NOT in 3D. |
|
| |
what is the use of an orgy if its not 3D?? |
|
| |