Half a croissant, on a plate, with a sign in front of it saying '50c'
h a l f b a k e r y
Baker Street Irregulars

idea: add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random

meta: news, help, about, links, report a problem

account: browse anonymously, or get an account and write.

user:
pass:
register,


             

Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register. Please log in or create an account.

wikiGPT

 Humans remark on GPTs answers to various Wikipedia entries
 
(0) 		  [vote for,
against]

I never saw GPT get something right.

So this website will assist it with human markings of NEED SOURCE or REVIEWED and ACCEPTED, or simply WRONG with a source for that.

Then people like me who all their life spewed out information about everything (and life and the world) and now find themselves out of work with Chat GPT, will have what to waste their lives on.

—pashute, May 21 2023

[link]






       Unfortunately AI systems are probably being used as those fact checkers right now.
—xenzag, May 21 2023
   

       I Iive in a place where everything is interpreted via two diametrically opposed systems of truth, where one person's sectarian terrorist murderer is another person's legitimate freedom fighter. The truth is established by the last person to add it to the history books and changed by the next person who rubs it out. The masters of this is a political/terrorist organisation called Sinn Fein who are busy rewriting history every day and expunging from it their every action. I only totally trust what I have directly experienced. Give me gravity every day.
—xenzag, May 21 2023
   

       I think this idea is a bit "ambulance at the bottom of the cliff".
Rather, it would be better to fact-check the ChatGPT (& all the others) source data, & remove all the mis-information crap off the internet while you're at it. So when people or AIs search for things, the answers are correct!
—neutrinos_shadow, May 21 2023
   

       Facts change according to who owns them. Who's going to do the checking? example Russia says they didn't destroy an underwater gas supply pipe. How's that going to be fact checked?
—xenzag, May 21 2023
   

       but its our wiki, so we control who has access to it and what gets on it. We share with other humans the interactions that we had with the AI, and have open discussions about it. The AIs can perhaps learn from it after a while, and get better info.   

       A1, don't you think that's a waste of words for explaining what fact-checking is and who's a fact-checker?   

       BTW, Israelis can't say Fact. It comes out f***ed.
—pashute, Jun 11 2023
   

       //possibly longer//   

       Specifically Thucydides, the Father of Fact-Checking (in contrast to Herodotus, the Father of Click-Bait).
—pertinax, Jun 11 2023
   
      
[annotate]
   


 

back: main index
business  computer  culture  fashion  food  halfbakery  home  other  product  public  science  sport  vehicle