h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
cardiovascular disease is the thing most people die from
atherosclerosis is the source of most heart disease
historically "silent ischemia" caused sudden death as about a third of all CHD; 300k persons per year USA; so a few million persons globally
"sudden" death MI is predictable a few hours
prior to the event with bloodflow sensors that do computed measurements; make those sensors a part of steering wheel covers
people frequently touch their steering wheels thus its possible that parts of the day as well as evening will have coverage
NB: along with finger bloodflow I've read material that says breath gases also predict "sudden" death a few hours prior to the event; it is possible that the gas volume area of a vehicle could be used
perhaps among a population of drivers (combined) coverage would be cheaper with these sensors
the treon cure heart disease video
http://youtube.com/watch?v=YuLvbep4t4I ideas welcome; this video actually talks more about using genetically engineered rice or atletes foot to cure atherosclerosis ; fluoroniacin as well as as a new type of CHD drug are there as well; vividly improvable [beanangel, Mar 16 2008]
[link]
|
|
Can you cite the journal article
regarding
the predictability of sudden death by
MI? |
|
|
Also, be aware that a test for any
disease is counterproductive unless it
has a low false-positive rate. Imagine
that your device predicts infarction with
a fale-negative rate of only 1% (which
would be astounding), but also has a
false-positive rate of only 1% (equally
astounding). |
|
|
Now let's assume that there are 150
million Americans who get into their
cars twice a day (ie, 300 million "tests"
per day). Of these people, about 1000
will have an ischaemic attack at some
point in the day. On this basis: |
|
|
a) Number of correct predictions =
990
b) Number of false negatives (failed to
predict MI) = 10
c) Number of false positives (wrongly
predicted an MI) = 3,000,000 |
|
|
In other words, even with a sensor that
is 99% accurate both ways, you will
generate three MILLION false alarms per
day. |
|
|
To put it another way, only one in 3000
warnings will be 'valid'. And this is on
the assumption of near-perfect sensors. |
|
|
You really didn't think this one though,
did you, Treoand? |
|
|
Umm, Max, if the false positive, and false negative for this test are both 1%, then I'm pretty sure that only 2970 in 3000 warnings would be "valid." |
|
|
While this system is still going to produce a lot of false positives, I think Treon isn't the only one that needs to think this through again. |
|
|
[ye_river] - you said 2970 out of 3000, [Max] said 990 out of 1000 - it's the same proportion of correct diagnoses. The important bit is that if the alarm goes off, (red flashing lights, a loud "You Are Having A Heart Attack!" voice, etc.) you can rest assured that there's a probability of only 990/3000000 that you really are having a heart attack (or to put it another way, 0.03% of the time the alarm goes off, it'll be correct). |
|
|
Ian, get thee to a BBC comedy scriptwriting
contract... |
|
|
nfarct this, nfarct that. No nfarction idea here. |
|
|
Those most at risk - the overweight, stressed, elderly, addicted and afflicted - would, I suggest, tend to register bloodflow irregularities from the simple act of levering themselves into a car. If they won't listen to their doctors, their families, their teachers, or Oprah, why will they pay any attention to a steering wheel cover? |
|
|
Coming soon, the defibrillating airbag. |
|
|
// If they won't listen to their doctors, their families, their teachers, or Oprah, why will they pay any attention to a steering wheel cover? // |
|
|
Because for many people, their cars are very important. I think there's a good chance they'd listen to their car when nothing else could reach them, actually. |
|
| |