h a l f b a k e r yactual product may differ from illustration
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I think many street lamps have light
detecting sensors built into them,
though the
idea for collectively turning them off to
enable the viewing of a night sky has
merit, but watch the crime statistics ! + |
|
|
Lisa Simpson asked me to bun you. |
|
|
change your name to really lovely dork |
|
|
In order to implement the idea without crime rates soaring, motion sensors could activate each street light and the ones adjacent to them only if there is movement. |
|
|
less light pollution would be nice. |
|
|
Crime rates? We here have the capability - with motion sensing, MP3 playing, Bluetooth networked garden gnomes - to halt any dark-induced crime wave! |
|
|
I don't see that crime would be a problem; where these systems are in use you'd just need to put up "NO CRIME ALLOWED" notices. [+] |
|
|
I assume the municipality would similarly mandate that vehicles drive without headlights. |
|
|
<rant> They should mandate that headlights on new vehicles shouldn't exceed 1990 levels of lumen. Kind of a Kyoto Protocol initiative to restore some sense to the current manufacturers' Red Queen-esque headlight power race. </rant> |
|
|
//motion sensors//
Aren't "crime sensors" what we really need to make this work? |
|
|
Wouldn't the muggers just watch the weather channel more? |
|
|
I'm not sure I would like the strobe effect of several someones getting mugged outside of my house. |
|
|
I wonder if anyone has developed a low sensitivity motion detector that will trigger if someone is say walking along, but not if they are moving within a limited space (say a five foot circle). It would definitely be doable with imaging technology, but not cheap. |
|
|
That would allow motion detection when people needed it, but not when they were standing still to stargaze. |
|
| |