h a l f b a k e r yA hive of inactivity
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
the way people are spread in the tube carriage during very busy periods just looks ridiculous. a lucky few have managed to get seats. then there will be people standing in the ailse, who have room to move and breathe. and then there will be people standing around the door area who have managed to
squeeze onto the train but find themselves wedged between three people and the door in some awkward position that they can't move out of until the doors open again at the next station.
there is a lot of space on trains not being used. football stadiums used to have much larger capacities when they were terraced rather than all-seater. the same will be true for trains.
the idea is to remove all the solid seating arrangements that exist now, and replace them with flip down seats like the ones at the cinema. but before a train embarks on it's rush hour journey, a locking device will be activated that prevents the seats from being flipped down. the driver can activate this like they activate the doors at a station. this way, instead of a lucky few having a seat and so much space, while most are cramped and squashed, everyone has equal standing room. a couple of seats could be left, for disabled/elderly/children. then once the rush hour is over, the seats can be activated again.
i'm not sure if this is feasable, the seats on the tube seem to have some radiator/heater underneath them, that might be impossible to do without. i don't know.
you could also say that this might lead to dangerous overcrowding... but the way i see it is that the state things are in now is just as dangerous.
[link]
|
|
I imagine you'd still have to keep a few regular seats for the elderly and such, but it seems like this would work. |
|
|
Baked on the NY subway, except they're intended for use by those in wheelchairs. (i.e., wheelchair person can use that space with the seat left up; in the absence of such a person, others can use the seat regularly. To make the point, the seat is heavily sprung so it pops back up when you stand again.) |
|
|
nah, have trains that are twice as long... |
|
|
Or you could have even more powerful springs on the seats so that all the sitters are scrunched up with their knees by their ears, taking up less space. |
|
|
[po], The trains can't be any longer - they wouldn't fit the platforms. |
|
|
Seems a reasonable idea. I wonder how many people would you get in if you stacked them horizontally, like sardines, on stretcher-like platforms ? <very bad taste> Then if they asphyxiated, or died of heatstroke, they could be slid out straight into body bags </very bad taste> |
|
|
stop at the station, let the people on and off and then move further up the tunnel/line for the 2nd lot. hey, the railways are in my blood. |
|
|
[po] - the trains would have to spend longer at each station and this would make journey times a lot longer. |
|
|
Can't you just move them through the tunnel hanging on their straps like dry-cleaning and switch off the correct ones at each station? |
|
|
[FarmerJohn] If people wore special "subway coats" with rings on the back, a bit like a parachutist's harness, they could just hook themselves onto an overhead rail and be whisked away down the tunnels ..... |
|
|
NB: Keep tight hold of your shopping .... |
|
|
// the railways are in my blood // |
|
|
That's one mighty strange immune system you've got there, [po]. |
|
|
I hope you don't have tracks on your arms, [po]. |
|
|
Sorry, cruel to be kind and all that. |
|
|
Sheepdogs. You need sheepdogs. |
|
|
and I avoided saying trains to lead you away from those puns. |
|
|
I would croissant this for being a good idea - but the truth of the matter is - more and more people would be crammed into the extra space. the very thought of it makes me nauseous. |
|
| |