h a l f b a k e r yIt's not a thing. It will be a thing.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I did something similar to this when I was a teenager. |
|
|
I doubt it was legal. I don't think CB licenses allow for data transmissions, at least in the UK. |
|
|
(Edit: Ah, your comment about channels 22 and 23 refers to the USA.) |
|
|
How about steganographic data transmission? Nobody would ever know apart from people reading this anno. |
|
|
RTTY on Ham radio has been Baked for decades. This is only a minor variation on an existing theme, but amusingly retro none the less. [+] |
|
|
I'm not sure anyone would notice data were being sent over CB here in the UK. I've thought about sending little files over walkie-talkie frequencies, just as little blips sort of. |
|
|
I always like possible backup solutions like this for the
impending collapse of the internet/satellites/etc. due to
EMP. And here in the (free) USA we don't need a CB
license ;) |
|
|
No licence for CB here in England either. |
|
|
Looks like you're right, [nineteenthly], since 2006. Crikey, I'm starting to turn into an old fart. |
|
|
Happened to me ages ago, [Wrongfellow]. |
|
|
I think what it would come down to, because i'm seriously considering doing this, is whether it's easier to make a walkie-talkie type transmitter-receiver or a CB one, and maybe also which is easier to interface to a sound card. They should both be dead easy, i would think, since they both have microphones and speakers. |
|
| |