h a l f b a k e r yOutside the bag the box came in.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I hope this gets baked soon. I have never once done the wash without leaving something unfortunate in my pockets. Usually tissues, change, pencils, notepads, and occasionally small snacks; so far no children or pets that I have noticed. Then again, I haven't been checking. + for the reminder. |
|
|
...Ah, the musical sound of rock collections and legos tumbling around in the washing machine. symphonic to the ear of every loving parent... |
|
|
...The joy of discovery when you find your ball point after the rinse cycle... |
|
|
...the beauty of a dryer influenced sculpture of melted crayons, permanently attached to a new shirt... |
|
|
It brings a tear to my eye that you would deprive millions of these simple pleasures. + |
|
|
I'll buy one when it beeps if you try to put a red in a load of whites....[+] |
|
|
I want to know how does the scan work? If you need to pass each item "slowly" why not just check the pocket manually? Wouldn't that accomplish the same task?? Bone |
|
|
You could probably pick up children and pets by infrared. |
|
|
Nice. I once washed [jonthegeologist]'s driving license and became least popular girlfriend for the day. |
|
|
yes but it's *clean* now. no pleasing some folk! |
|
|
That's what I said. Didn't go down so well. I was just trying to help, honest! |
|
|
This should get baked with the additional function of telling the idiot whos operating it [guess who] that he has accidentally added a red shirt (that runs) to a fully white load. I ended up with a pink wardrobe. |
|
|
Just read Norm's anno. Sorry for the repeat. |
|
|
Our wash day problems stem more from non-metallic items like cat fur and tissues. But how will your device distinguish zips and rivets from pocket items? |
|
|
Why bother? It all recoverable as bellybutton lint. |
|
|
RFIDs can conceivably solve the red socks in the white wash problem depending on the discrimination limits. |
|
|
Again, that's just a discrimination problem. My reference is to the absolute maximum number of tags that can de discerned at once. |
|
|
all very well but its the crumpled tissue that is my main bugbear |
|
|
red socks! who wears red socks? |
|
|
Well, that's certainly up from the 40 or so the last time I looked which seemed a bit low for a full load of clothing. |
|
|
why not add in a robotic presorter. it would grab an item from the main pile, read the tag, put item in a bin with similar items. rejects, for what ever reason, get put aside.
when a bin is a full load the robot inserts the entire bin in its washer then later moves it to its dryer. |
|
|
[po] this is a great idea, but how does the machine scan the clothes? I can see how a scan for metal would be easy enough but paper? |
|
|
I thought that the link explained it. |
|
|
Ah yes, silly me! I think you'd still need the screen to see paper - don't suppose the scanner could distinguish that from clothes except in a visual manner. [+] |
|
|
How about extend the idea? |
|
|
Instead of the washing intructions label on the clothes, it has a tiny waterproof chip. This can be scanned by the machine to see what setting to wash on. |
|
|
You could even have more than one washer built into one machine, and let the machine sort out your clothes. |
|
|
Heck, you could even turn it into a personal robot that would do your bidding. |
|
|
What about some personal responsibility for our stuff, eh? |
|
| |