h a l f b a k e r y[marked-for-tagline]
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
sometimes people think that some inventions deserve more croissants than they can give... so i propose that this button be created, however, only one vote will count for the total real croissantage, the rest will be kept on a tally. if only ten votes exist for an invention, but 100 exist on the "total"
vote # it means that only ten people voted, and they all loved it...
[link]
|
| |
There was once an idea here for the "yes yes yes!" vote, a similar concept. |
|
| |
sarge, I think you can say "yes,yes,yes" and "multiple croissants to ya" or "nice one, dukie" or some such to show your appreciation. |
|
| |
Self-exploratory? <shudder> |
|
| |
I can't see any advantage to the idea. It's just different, and I rarely see the point (underwear excluded) of changing anything without changing to something better. |
|
| |
it is spelled correctly... explanitory, can you read? or is my computer wrong? yours? |
|
| |
//Otherwise it's spelt "self-explanatory"// |
|
| |
Oddly enough, the voting on the "Yes! Yes! Yes! Vote" idea ended up at 17/-4, so it was rather better received than this, which is essentially the same idea. Wonder what that means? |
|
| |
I think it means sequels aren't generally well-regarded. |
|
| |
I would prefer to think it had something to do with the respective authors, though it might be the complete absence of capital letters. And spell checker. |
|
| |
and prequels are awfuk. you looking at me curly? |
|
| |