h a l f b a k e r yWhat was the question again?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
sometimes people think that some inventions deserve more croissants than they can give... so i propose that this button be created, however, only one vote will count for the total real croissantage, the rest will be kept on a tally. if only ten votes exist for an invention, but 100 exist on the "total"
vote # it means that only ten people voted, and they all loved it...
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
There was once an idea here for the "yes yes yes!" vote, a similar concept. |
|
| |
sarge, I think you can say "yes,yes,yes" and "multiple croissants to ya" or "nice one, dukie" or some such to show your appreciation. |
|
| |
Self-exploratory? <shudder> |
|
| |
I can't see any advantage to the idea. It's just different, and I rarely see the point (underwear excluded) of changing anything without changing to something better. |
|
| |
it is spelled correctly... explanitory, can you read? or is my computer wrong? yours? |
|
| |
//Otherwise it's spelt "self-explanatory"// |
|
| |
Oddly enough, the voting on the "Yes! Yes! Yes! Vote" idea ended up at 17/-4, so it was rather better received than this, which is essentially the same idea. Wonder what that means? |
|
| |
I think it means sequels aren't generally well-regarded. |
|
| |
I would prefer to think it had something to do with the respective authors, though it might be the complete absence of capital letters. And spell checker. |
|
| |
and prequels are awfuk. you looking at me curly? |
|
| |