h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
The amount of metal that gets thrown out and ends up in landfill must be huge. There must be a way of separating this metal that is cost comparable to mining. I am currently on holidays in a former tin mining town which has inspired this idea.
My idea is to use a magnetic field to perform the separation.
Using a magnet to separate ferrous metal from rubbish is obvious and well known. There is also a method of separating non-ferrous metal using magnets; my idea is a variation on this method.
The already known method of separating non-ferrous metal is to quickly pass (drop) the mix through a gradient magnetic field. The magnetic field produces eddy currents (and hence an opposing magnetic field) in the metal which deflects the metal sideways and thus separated. (sorry, can't provide links; using a rudimentary phone to post this).
This is a pretty good method, but has a few drawbacks. Firstly, the rubbish would need to be an approximately uniform size to be deflected: too big (or small?) and it won't work. Secondly, it only works on a narrow stream of rubbish.
My idea is to *slow* rather than deflect the metal. So drop the rubbish from the top of a tower (evacuated of air) with magnetic field running through it. The non- metal objects reach the bottom before the metal objects. Use a timed capture mechanism to get metal objects.
(?) Belt-type eddy-current separator
http://www.lowcostm...ery.co.uk/metal.asp
Eddies in the spacetime continuum. [MaxwellBuchanan, Jan 01 2010]
US patent 4,070,278
https://patents.goo...om/patent/US4070278
vaguely similar [xaviergisz, Jun 10 2010, last modified Nov 19 2018]
[link]
|
| |
ah, the internet ate half my idea. I've rewritten the lost bit (its a bit terse; I'm worried it might happen again). |
|
| |
The problem would be (if I understand) that it would not be
suitable for continuous operation - you need to drop the
objects singly or in small batches. |
|
| |
Industrial eddy-current belt-type separators seem to handle
stuff of a reasonable range of sizes. In any case, you'd
probably want to be shredding the input material in order to
recover maximum material from mixed-material items, no? |
|
| |
Yep, the rubbish would be dropped in batches, but this would be frequent (every few seconds). |
|
| |
The rubbish could be sorted iteratively: the slow to fall rubbish would be shredded and dropped again. |
|
| |
The thing is, modern manufacturing sticks other
materials into and on the metals making them harder
to get a clean recovery product. The smaller the
material is chewed the more likely there will be only
metal to put through your non-ferrous spectrometer. |
|
| |