h a l f b a k e r yLoading tagline ....
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
no, because a runner will need to use more energy to move a 150kg body for 10miles than a 60kg body for the same distance, however it's not the number of joules she's comparing, it's the cardiac exercise. For two people with the same weight will use a very similar amount of energy to shift their mass across the same distance - take that as your basic measurement. But the runner with the shorter legs will have to take more steps and so the additional effort (but not necessarily energy, if her technique is good) is what she's trying to quantify, and if not quantify, at least normalise around that additional expense of effort. I would just have a question; when you say average do you mean the crude average or the middle of the distribution of inseam lengths? Would love to see this statistic if possible; but I suspect that nervous runners might not appreciate old man race marshals measuring their inseam at the start of the race. And sooo much opportunity for cheating (mate, would you go and pick up my race number? you have shorter legs than me and I want to improve my inseam-normalised time...) |
|
|
Then we would have to make adjustments to all sports. In basketball, hoop height changes depending on who is shooting, similar in volleyball, tennis etc.. |
|
|
There would need to be a complete allowance for foot size as well, flexibility etc. Shorter legs=more steps per minute. That's life (unfair). |
|
|
Basketball; tall hoops, but then tall guys, so what's the point. |
|
|
futurebird AKA the worlds fastest halfbaker, you are grading yourself on a steep curve - that is some formidable competition in NYC and you should be proud of yourself for having made such progress in their ranks already. Sings "Inchworm" |
|
|
Stilts. Or, Inspector Gadget legs. |
|
|
Throw lung capacity in there too. |
|
| |