h a l f b a k e r y"Bun is such a sad word, is it not?" -- Watt, "Waiting for Godot"
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
google fairnessizer
an eye tracking view of google ads reveals that the top ad gets most of the visual attention; create ultrasubtle background activity to grow eyespace | |
viewing the eyetracking link we see that when people view google ads at the right they just see maybe three of them;
I think a clever toning background or a near threshold of perception lightening effect could be shown to stretch the amount of google ads actually seen n Measurably remembered
as
Google is worth billions yet only the top few ads get the visual play this is a bit of a risk
its quite possible that a bigger visual field with a different revenue scheme could up their revenue hundreds of millions n give their stock a reason to rise
I'm just thinking this is a job that Ian Tindale could do n even patent the Ian version; all I write is public domain
eyetracking google ads
http://megabluewave...ggoldentriangle.jpg
[beanangel, Feb 28 2008]
[link]
|
| |
Living in Treon World is even worse than I imagined. |
|
| |
I suspect the limit of three is how many ads people are prepared to read, and is not a measure of how far their eyes wander. So, even if you could get their eyes to wander further down the page, they won't be reading any more ads. |
|
| |
(I'm puzzled: I don't read any Google ads at all. Or maybe that's consciously.) |
|
| |
//a clever toning background or a near threshold of perception lightening effect// |
|
| |
Someone hasn't been to the internet's underbelly, lately. That's all they do. I think "trashy" might explain why it's not done on google. |
|
| |
Growing eyespace does sound interesting, in a science fiction kind of context. |
|
| |
wcw wrote an item much like which I edited |
|
| |
What inspired the title? Fairnessizer? People pay more for top placement and "fairly" less for less desireable realestate. And you don't [create an idea] to change the fairnes-size at all...... |
|
| |
----------- ------------------ ---------------------- -------------------- ---------
WcW, Feb 27 2008 |
|
| |