h a l f b a k e r yIt might be better to just get another gerbil.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
the picture on one side of the jigsaw could include a smaller image of the picture on the other side; including the smaller image of the picture on the other side...
It's tweezy
http://www.youtube....watch?v=tex_lYArYc0
[Phrontistery, Jun 19 2012]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
You need to look beyond the last visible dog. |
|
| |
Further, each piece could contain somewhere on its surface, a small image of that piece. |
|
| |
I think this is far cleverer than it sounds. + |
|
| |
If each puzzle piece were created from miniature puzzle pieces, which were themselves c.f.m.p.p, etc. |
|
| |
And the puzzle itself was one of many which when complete, formed the pieces of a larger puzzle... |
|
| |
Fractalize the edges. Although they might get a little complicated in shape, putting it together would be simple. |
|
| |
trust [RayfordSteele] to give us a frill. |
|
| |
With [RayfordSteele]'s correction, a [+]. |
|
| |
I'd like to point out that there is a difference between a
'jigsaw' and a 'jigsaw puzzle', and that seemingly harmless
confusion of the two terms when used in conjunction with
exciting mathmatical concepts can ultimately lead to
episodes of great disappointment for certain breeds of tool
fetishists. |
|
| |
How many times would you have to unflip it, to get
to a point where the picture on the other side was
just a massive pixel? |
|
| |