h a l f b a k e r y"It would work, if you can find alternatives to each of the steps involved in this process."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
This cup-shaped coffee maker would make a tablespoon of
coffee at a time. The water and coffee grounds reservoirs
would be contained in a robustly sealed container. No spill
could be over a tablespoon's worth and the coffee would
always be hot and fresh.
[link]
|
| |
Sorry two cups of coffee is only acceptable. |
|
| |
Single cup coffee makers are widely known to exist |
|
| |
Has anyone done a USB coffee maker? With the power
available from a USB port, and some cunningly efficient
engineering, my guess is that you ought to be able to grind
seven or eight beans and turn them into a thimblefull of very
satisfying coffee, every few minutes. |
|
| |
I dont think it would work. the first few drops of
water that pass though the grinds, don't do much
for flavour, the drips after that are great. and
then the at a certain point any water passing
though the beans will only bring out the awful
bitter tastes. |
|
| |
This might work if you gulped down the entire cup
in one continuous gulp, but if you let the
dampened grinds rest in between they would
taste horrible. |
|
| |
There are however travel mugs that have built in
french press, but these are no more spill proof
than the regular kind. |
|
| |
[+] While I'd settle for a coffee mug warmer, I'd much prefer this. |
|
| |
[bob] At no time does the post state that the entire cupful is made at the same time: quite the opposite. |
|
| |