h a l f b a k e r yI CAN HAZ CROISSANTZ?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
Exactly. Except that the idea is only good for a fairly short time. Human bodies exhale a mighty amount of air post mortem.
It would be good for, say, the transport of a body between crime scene and crime lab. |
|
|
Low pressure inert gas might be better than vacuum. Isn't it more likely that vacuum will promote evaporation of volatiles, and alter the pattern of post-mortem changes ? |
|
|
What if your vacuum pump accidentally sucks up vital hair, fibre or skin flakes from the deceased ? |
|
|
Using a vacuum might promote false petechiae, those broken blood vessels that are very often indicative of asphyxiation as the cause of death. |
|
|
Also creating a vacuum around the corpse might result in the total evacuation of the remaining bowel contents, contaminating any trace evidence. |
|
|
Suggested category- Public:Law Enforcement. |
|
|
Suggested Title: Shrink-Wrap Body Bag |
|
|
Suggested Tag Line: Forensic evidence preservation by vacuum. |
|
|
But wouldn't a vacuum make certain volatile chemicals evaporate faster? Do any forensically important substances react or decompose in air? |
|
|
Only needs to be air-tight, methinks. |
|
|
Bad idea. Consider one of those vacuum bags they sell on TV to compress your travel garmets. |
|
|
Shrink-wrapping anything down to a near vacuum applies tremendous pressure to the applied surface, and would collapse the lungs and soft body tissues. |
|
|
In fact, this is how we would squeeze out the excess glue when laying up carbon fiber / nomex body panels on the solar car. A cheap 14 psi or so, without having to put several tons of weights on the panel. |
|
|
You also run the risk of evacuating important micro-evidence in the process. |
|
|
If you were just removing excess air from surrounding the body and not dropping below atmospheric, that might be okay. |
|
| |