h a l f b a k e r yWhy not imagine it in a way that works?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
| |
There would need to be a different "link" button for purely internal operations, but it can be done. |
|
| |
Actually, the Halfbakery linking logic already
detects internal links, deleting the domain part of
the URL to make it a relative link |
|
| |
Are you sure about that ? |
|
| |
The external URL for this idea is: |
|
| |
"https://www. halfbakery.com/idea /bidirectional_20 intra-Halfbakery_20 links #1606922268" which includes the unique numeric identifier; the recursive link we have inserted is "https://www.halfbakery.com /idea/ bidirectional_20intra- Halfbakery_20links". |
|
| |
The domain's present in both those instances. |
|
| |
if you edit that link though, does the full URL show
in the URL text entry box? |
|
| |
Just out of interest [hip], what did your last slave die of ...? Overwork, by any chance ? |
|
| |
No real reason, just wanted to confirm a suspicion. |
|
| |
Yes, I know - that's what I was saying. It was [8th]
who was saying that the whole URL was in the field |
|
| |
Also it feels slightly odd to be posting an idea on
the Halfbakery on a topic I know something about, but
the subject of this idea is basically pretty close to
what I wrote my PhD on. |
|
| |
// originally I had said 8th had it right // |
|
| |
Drat and double drat ... our Cunning Plan has failed to confuse and befuddle [kdf] ... (since [hippo] is pretty much the Gold Standard for befuddlement and confusion, we didn't expect to achieve anything there). |
|
| |
We'd have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you pesky kids. |
|
| |
Not to question [jutta]'s awesomeness in the creation of the
halfbakery; but perhaps instead of an annotations "user &
date" tag being right aligned below the final line of an
annotation, having it LEFT aligned below would be better, as
all usernames would be in the same relative place, and so
easier to find & follow. |
|
| |
Cloned links or annotations by rank seems to be a concept
held over from the 1990s. Over my head, certainly, but y'all
cyber-whizzes go on. |
|
| |
I like this, but it makes my head spin today. All this back and
forth... |
|
| |
//what did your last slave die of ...?// |
|
| |
Not doing what he was told. |
|
| |
May I give it a bun? Even if I don’t understand the
chatter and I must say to [8th]... you did not fail
to confuse and befuddle me! The idea made sense
when I first read it. |
|
| |
// All this back and forth... // |
|
| |
I know what you mean, [blissy]. You might perhaps make a
few more annos and then click the recursive link at the top
to see if your annos are on the original idea or the copy.
Holding the screen up to a mirror may help. |
|
| |
Is it snowing yet in your neck of the woods? |
|
| |
//click the recursive link// Ah! A many-worlds-hypothesis test! |
|
| |
// you did not fail to confuse and befuddle me! // |
|
| |
Sadly, that's not something we can look on as any sort of an achievement ... |
|
| |
//[hippo] is pretty much the Gold Standard for befuddlement and
confusion// - such flattery! |
|
| |