h a l f b a k e r yCaution!
Contents may be not!
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
Henna stays on skin because it chemically attaches to keratin with the michael reaction (wikipedia) . Optically transparent UV absorbing hennalike chemical could be sunscreen. Further yet, restroom soap could have a michael reaction bacteriocide that would link to the skin on palms causing them to
have 1/10,000 the amount of living bacteria.
That way, people who only washed their hands about 1 of every 100 restroom visits would be 100 times less disease spreading than people who do it every time with regular soap.
The restroom application also thoroughly tests the safety of the particular chemicals used. Then there is the possibility of a michael reaction bacteriocidal STD prevention you only have to apply it once every 10 or 100 sexual activities to minimize STDs
[link]
|
| |
Sadness. All my friendly, helpful bacteria are going to be decimated^3. |
|
| |
Decimated^3 = 0.90 * 0.90 * 0.90 = 0.73 |
|
| |
That's a damn good survival rate! |
|
| |
As to the idea, hasn't it been established that anti-bacterial
soap is helping create super-bugs? |
|
| |
It depends on the bacteriocide in the soap but, yes. The best policy for antibacterial soaps would be to have a rota of maybe three different types of bacteriocide, with the manufacturers obliged to switch (in sync with eachother) every year or so. Either that or just stick to the simpler bacteriocides, against which resistance is unlikely to emerge. |
|
| |
Sorry, It's reversed isn't it, the Romans only killed one in ten not nine in ten. |
|
| |
Just save the antibacterials until they are needed rather than a blanket blind turkey shoot. |
|
| |