h a l f b a k e r yI CAN HAZ CROISSANTZ?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
The "scientific content" tag would be hard to append. To some, a display is black magic. Other's here are on the edge of rocket science or biotech advances. |
|
|
// make me feel stupid and inadequate // |
|
|
But that's the usual motivation for posting the ideas ... |
|
|
Is it so bad to run the risk of learning something? [-] |
|
|
I like a certain level of science, but often read half an idea
only to realise I understand less than 50% of the words.
That tends to hinder the learning process! (This is not a
criticism of those ideas BTW). |
|
|
I love wading into an idea and annos that I know I'm not going to fully understand. |
|
|
[2fries], you got it. I enjoy reading over my head and parsing what I can of it. |
|
|
I sympathise [MikeOliver]. The issue is not 'scientific content' though. It is the author that has failed to hit the target audience. |
|
|
That intense irritation is the feeling of your brain growing stronger. |
|
|
I'm with UB. I think you are allowing the crazies to intimidate you, but tagging is an interesting idea. + |
|
|
// There are some, well... one, 'baker who posts
scientific-sounding gobbledygook regularly. I simply filtered it
out of my HB view because I found the crap it posted intensely
irritating.//
Yeah, thanks for reminding me about b-------l. Done |
|
| |