h a l f b a k e r yQuis custodiet the custard?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I recently had occasion to separate the wires of a length of lamp
(zip)
cord, then later wished to rejoin the pair. Of course this could be
done
using electrical tape, shrinky tubing, etc. But maybe there's a better
way?
I propose that zip cord, and in fact all forms of multi-wire sheathless
cable be manufactured in a version wherein each conductor would
have insulation extruded with Ziploc-style edges, one each male and
female per conductor.
In this way, multi-wire cables could be non-destructively separated
and recombined as necessary.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
Well, it would cause a whole host of other problems, but there's certainly the occasion that it would come in handy (+) |
|
| |
This, I think, is an excellent idea. [+] |
|
| |
[normzone], What sort of problems do you see? |
|
| |
Why was I thinking of bungie-jumping cord when I read this title? |
|
| |
Somebody would have to redesign and control the specifications for ALL connector interfaces to account for the change in dimension / shape of the insulation. |
|
| |
And have you ever attempted to get an uncooperative ziplock to "thread" and begin mating? It's a technology that works great when it's working and is butt-stubborn when it's not perfectly lined up at the start, and becomes increasingly grumpy once it's been mis-threaded. |
|
| |
And of course it will voluntarily mate and become one every time you intended it to remain single. |
|
| |
The interface zone will collect small particle debris over time, leading to the advertised mate-ability being unreliable when you decide you need it. |
|
| |
We're not going to be zipping and unzipping this every
hour. It just has to unzip when necessary; and if the
rezipping is a bit of a fiddle, you can live with it. |
|
| |
Can I suggest a compromise? You don't want the cord
to unzip unintentionally. So, have the two zipped
strands held together with a thin web of material
(just like a regular cord). On the rare occasion that
you want to unzip part of the cord, the webs tear
(again, as with a regular cord) and the zip unzips.
The unzipped cord can then be rezipped - it won't be
as strong against unzipping as before, but it'll be OK. |
|
| |
I am usually open to compromise, but in this case, will stick to my ...
insulation. How about hexagonal cross-sections, with alternating
bumps and fissures, so that either flat or circular geometries can be
made? |
|
| |
Could also be formed in spiral patterns (like licorice sticks) to
minimise dust collection. This might spin off a related idea: licorice
construction kits ? But maybe this would be too sticky. |
|
| |
A simpler alternative would be to just make sure that
a really, really high current is passing through the
conductors at all times. In which case, they will stick
together magnetically. |
|
| |