h a l f b a k e r y"More like a cross between an onion, a golf ball, and a roman multi-tiered arched aquaduct."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Word Futures
Patent entire families of words, then sell them to businesses who want to use the names for products | |
You know how people buy domain names, like www,jesus.com, and then sell them for large smounts of scratch? Would it be possible to patent/copyright entire families of invented words and acronyms, and then sell/lease them to businesses who want to use them to name their products? As in, I could think
of every possible name for an electric car, playing on the word "Spark": UrbSpark, SparKar, SparKurrent, or the word "Electro" (CarLectro, ElectroZoom, etc). Then, when someone invents an electric car, I've already thought of every possible name and copyrighted it, so the inventors of the car have to pay me to have an appealing marketable name for their vehicle.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
You can't copyright a word. |
|
| |
Words can only be *trademarked*. Patents, copyright and trademarks are all very different things, and people that would make suggestions based on them would be advised to learn what they are. |
|
| |
Depending on jurisdiction, you're only allowed to trademark words you're actively using to describe your product or service and words that are not in general use otherwise. If someone else starts using a word you have trademarked, the onus is on you to stop them (generally via lawsuit), otherwise you lose the mark. |
|
| |
In short, speculative trademarking doesn't work. If it did, people would have started doing it a long time ago. |
|
| |
Damn! I'm just looking for a reason to quit my job and stay home making up fun word melds. ElectroSkank! CyberBlob! |
|
| |
Faith Pxpcxrn is a visionary. She correctly predicted the
demand for "foodaceuticals," a word she coined in 1990 to
capture the benefits-added craze seen in supermarket
products today (the Being Alive™ Trend), and four-wheel
drives (Fantasy Adventure™), as well as the spiritual tenor
of the millennium (Anchoring™). She was the first to
anticipate the explosive growth in home delivery, home
businesses and home shopping (Cocooning™). |
|
| |
Her hour-long seminar, which focuses on how future
Trends are affecting consumer lifestyles and purchasing
behavior, has been presented to thousands of audiences
across the globe. |
|
| |
Through her future-focused marketing consultancy, Faith
Pxpcxrn’s BrainRxsxrve, Ms. Pxpcxrn works with clients,
applying her insights on cultural and business Trends, to
reposition their company or a brand, define areas of new
business opportunity and develop new products.
Documented as having a 95% accuracy rate, Ms. Pxpcxrn
and BrainRxsxrve provide the inspiration and foresight
needed to predict evolving future consumer markets. |
|
| |
And... how do you pronounce that? O.o |
|
| |
Uh... what is it with everyone here having bad spelling? It's like a jinx in this topic. And who the frick is Faith Pxpcxrn?! I've never heard of her! |
|
| |
I think this idea was baked in Survivor : A Novel
by Chuck Palahniuk. In it, the protagonist’s manager, a marketing/PR guy works for a company that makes money by pre-trademarking every possible name for pharmaceutical drugs.
The mockups are delicious m&m's though. |
|
| |
I'd just add a '5000' or '2000' on the end of the particular word that I want for a trade-name and then you're out of the copyright. |
|
| |
I heard that someone trademarked 21st Century Fox and wanted a crazy sum of money to sell it. That's why it's Fox Searchlight. I have no evidence to back this up though so it may be a myth. |
|
| |
Nowadays, Jesus.com is owned by Ghandi.net. |
|
| |
Jxsus.com is available though, if anyone wants it. |
|
| |
I feel like there's an untapped area for domxin nxmes out there.
I just need some contxnt. |
|
| |
" Oh [naveline], why can't you be true ? |
|
| |
You're going back to doing that thing that you used to do .... " |
|
| |
A group, here in NZ, is campaigning for the the control and use of a word. Don't they know you can't tell the rest of the population, especially the young, how to say something. Pointless really. |
|
| |
It would be truly sad to have control over what is said. What a loss of surprise and puzzlement. |
|
| |