h a l f b a k e r yRenovating the wheel
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
The recent emphasis on male narcissism as evidenced by the "wax, don't shave" discussion has reminded me of my urban upbringing and the styles of yesteryear. There was a class of 'cool guy' ( to me, anyway, I was 10 or 11) who wore black pegged pants with a 1/2" belt, white socks, pointy black shoes
we called cockroach killers because they could reach into corners, and a light white, ribbed, sleeveless, open-necked undergarment that we called a wife beater. The hair was a waterfall of shiny curls and tipped up at the back. This look was perfected and became the uniform for what was then called hoodlums and vandals.
Given the current toxic male predilection to denude, smooth, and pamper every square inch themselves, and taking into consideration the total lack of decorum, manners, not to mention good taste, I propose a line of men's casual clothing meant to take advantage of this fad while it lasts.
The WifeBeater brand will be known as the UnderArmor killer, taking market share just on the name itself. Prominent MMA stars interviewed by Sly Stallone, all wearing the signature Arctic White WifeBeater OG Original ($92.50), will flex and preen. Nothing shows off a perfect, totally hairless, waxed and oiled torso and arms like a WifeBeater! Even slim hoodlums leaning back on brick walls look great in WifeBeaters.
Soon to introduce a feminine line of Lady WifeBeaters, betting on the highly charged baggage that name will create. If there's enough hue and cry we'll rename it Lady BallBusters. And next will be Kiddy WifeBeaters to start a new generation of MasterBeaters. We'll spin this out indefinitely. There are always enough narcissists to depend on for support. You just have to know the fad.
Rab C. Nesbitt
https://m.media-ama...M1ODI0Mw@@._V1_.jpg
"Eye will tell yew this" [Loris, Sep 14 2023]
Wife beater search trends since 2004
https://trends.goog...eater%20shirt&hl=en
[doctorremulac3, Sep 15 2023]
Are We Really Still Calling This Shirt a ‘Wife Beater’?
https://www.nytimes...-a-wife-beater.html
Article about origin of the term 'wifebeater' for clothing. [Loris, Sep 16 2023]
[link]
|
| |
That must have been a reprise of its name in the mid 50s. I never knew another name for the garment. |
|
| |
{peers quizzically at [a1], scuttles off to recalibrate radiocarbon dating device} |
|
| |
In the UK we call those vests. They have rather different connotations, being associated with Rab C. Nesbitt, a stereotypical articulate but barely comprehensible Scotsman. |
|
| |
I thought this was going to be an idea for a type of egg beater only for wives. |
|
| |
Well. You had to be there. Speakers from Connecticut, the New York boroughs, New Jersey, and Philadelphian argot, whether part of the written record or not, will certainly verify its use in the mid-50s. Anywhere spaghetti sauce is referred to as 'gravy.' Maybe I should have gone to see the Bugs Bunny exhibit. I'm older than anyone. I can tell. |
|
| |
The wiki entry for Tank Top: "The term wife-beater reportedly became synonymous for an undershirt after a 1947 criminal case where a Detroit man was arrested for beating his wife to death, and newspapers printed a photo of the "wife beater" wearing a stained undershirt." I do lie, but not here. |
|
| |
//Given the current toxic male predilection to denude, smooth, and pamper every square inch themselves// |
|
| |
I'm just going to point out the misandry inherent in this. And in the term "male narcissism". Flip the genders and I wouldn't be able to post those things here. Well, maybe here as -- very surprisingly to me -- freedom of speech seems to be pretty good but not most places. Not without getting banned. |
|
| |
Let's try it: Female narcissism. Toxic female predilection to denude, smooth, and pamper every square inch of themselves |
|
| |
As for the idea, [-] rant. not because of the abovementioned misandrous tone but because it's just not much of an idea. |
|
| |
[Voice] Very open interactions can explain. I don't hate men; I am one. I have always thought that men were more vain than women. Women have historically taken much better care of their appearance than men, which proves my point. Men think they are irresistible in whatever shape they show up. Until recently. |
|
| |
I find the primping and fussing very entertaining, and some of the results should be modeled, or encased, in wax. |
|
| |
//I have always thought that men were more vain than women. Women have historically taken much better care of their appearance than men// |
|
| |
So when women do it, it's just women being women. When men do it, it's narcissism. |
|
| |
Don't get me wrong, I kind of agree, but that's because I like a smooth, pampered, and denuded woman. |
|
| |
It's the difference between tactics and strategy. No blame. |
|
| |
//I have always thought that men were more vain than women. Women have historically taken much better care of their appearance than men, which proves my point. Men think they are irresistible in whatever shape they show up. Until recently.// |
|
| |
Bit of a Catch 22, then. If men attempt to improve their appearance, they're vain. But if they don't, it's because they think they're already very attractive, so they're vain.
Some call this Morton's Fork. |
|
| |
[Loris] Let other reasons illustrate something. Humans are all vain; men a bit more than women. I’m talking as a species, not a neurosis or original sin. Females have developed methods for getting the best mates using complicated tactical exercises that have evolved over time. Vain males have assumed they are a gift to women, not realizing the power is not really theirs. |
|
| |
Vanity and narcissism are different things. You can primp and fuss and not like yourself very much. Don’t you know anyone like this? |
|
| |
[Doc] Don’t overthink coincidence. If the incident took place in Detroit in 1947 and we were using the term 10 years later on the east coast it was not a local tribal thing. If I was devoted to researching this I could, no doubt, find written or film references that evaded Jesse Sheidlower and his very contemporary and recent attribution to “rap, gay, and gang culture.” The actual roots on the east coast were in do-wop, Sinatra, the Philly Stomp, Brillcream, and harmonizing in the men’s room. So Sheidlower was only 50 years off. Except for the gay thing. |
|
| |
[Doc] Difference of concerns. Go for it. If this is your project I wish you luck, knowing you will find some filmic capo using the term in what might be a black and white movie or Dion and the Belmonts wearing wifebeaters at a sock hop. Warm up the viewing apparatus and have at it. |
|
| |
The place to look for that sort of thing is dictionaries. They really care about when words were first used in what context. |
|
| |
dictionary.com says this for "wifebeater":
::ORIGIN OF WIFEBEATER
First recorded in 1650–60 for def. 1 and in 1990–95 for def. 2; wife + beater:: |
|
| |
where the definitions are:
1 a man who beats his wife.
2 Slang: Offensive. a white, sleeveless, close-fitting man’s undershirt, often worn as an outer shirt. |
|
| |
Realistically, if you can't find a dictionary claiming otherwise, any evidence is likely to be quite esoteric, if it exists at all. |
|
| |
//Y'know, if [minoradjustment]'s or anyone else says they recall and used a slang expression in their youth, it seems sort of ridiculous to say "oh no you didn't."// |
|
| |
The trouble is, memory isn't all that reliable. Even large groups of people can remember something incorrectly - it's called the Mandela effect.
Which isn't to say that minoradjustments is wrong - a word is often going to be used fairly widely before it's written down - at least, anywhere it will be preserved - but I would say it's not unreasonable to require evidence to be /convinced/ as opposed to extending the benefit of the doubt. |
|
| |
[Loris] Leaving out reasons is suspect? And why is it down to me to prove anything? I was there. Go fish. If my memory is faulty or the result of magical thinking I can live with it. I prefer to. It's all I've got. It's a good story and it put a burr under your saddle, so call it even [+][-]. |
|
| |
Well I buy it.
Wifebeater would have been an extremely derogatory term and wouldn't have made it into print or film back then.
They had some class. |
|
| |
//But even if it seems reasonable to ask for proof - how would you find proof of a usage that wasn’t written down anywhere?// |
|
| |
If it were my job (it's not, it's the lexicographer's), I would be looking for it to be written down, or possibly used in context in a film or audio recording of some sort.
Diaries and private correspondence seem to be acceptable sources - see for example the first attested use of OMG ("Oh My God") in 1917.
|
|
| |
//[Loris] Leaving out reasons is suspect?// |
|
| |
//And why is it down to me to prove anything?// |
|
| |
You make a claim, it's up to you to substantiate it. That's how it works. |
|
| |
//I was there. Go fish. If my memory is faulty or the result of magical thinking I can live with it. I prefer to. It's all I've got. It's a good story and it put a burr under your saddle, so call it even [+][-].// |
|
| |
You seem to think that I'm annoyed. I'm actually just commenting on the abstract theory. I don't have a problem with what you believe, but if something seems under-supported, I may point that out. |
|
| |
//Wifebeater would have been an extremely derogatory term and wouldn't have made it into print or film back then.// |
|
| |
Without checking myself, I imagine there really was a newspaper image of a guy in a vest in Detroit in 1947 with the legend "wifebeater". This is however considered to refer to the primary usage though i.e. domestic abuse. We can infer that it's not a taboo word - that is, it's not censored for general sensibilities. This puts it ahead of many words which were flat out banned, yet still there is copious evidence of useage for.
To use a word, particularly in writing, the communicator will generally want to be reasonably confident that the word would be understood by the recipient, or it doesn't get used. If a word isn't used at all, it doesn't count. |
|
| |
Given all that, it seems unlikely to me that the word was widely used with no documented evidence for over 30 years. I can believe it was used parochially. But I can also consider alternatives as plausible. E.g. in the early 90s, when there was a fad for wearing clothing in this style, someone saw this archived newspaper report, joked about it with their friends, and it caught on as a word - first locally, then throughout the USA.
|
|
| |
Wikipedia kind of implies continuity of the second usage from 1947 - but only with articles from 2018 and later, and of those, none back it up. One makes the claim with no evidence, the second is from a dictionary and says it's not true, and the third says it's a popular claim in the blogosphere but has no evidence and is probably a myth - they couldn't find the original wifebeater article from 1947 in news archives. And also some other evidence that it originated in the 90s which I won't repeat; I'll link the article directly instead. |
|
| |
[Loris] Lacking other resources I'm stymied. |
|
| |
[a1] “sullen amusement” goes perfectly with wifebeaters. |
|
| |