h a l f b a k e r yThis is what happens when one confuses "random" with "profound."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Inspired by what I *thought* I'd find behind the idea 'War Weapon':
"The United Nations today condemned the attack by Gorteshians on civilian casualties. Photographic evidence of officials from the neo-zen-theocratic, democracy-by-latent-proxy Gorteshians, using what can only be identified as 'War
Weapons' against their civilian political opponents, have shocked UN diplomats.
The 'War Weapons', clearly identifiable by their distinguishing features, were supplied to the fledgling government on the condition they be used only in defence of their new nation in times of war.
The Gorteshians will now have few public supporters in the veto action against them in the July summit. Riot police had been at the scene of protests for several days and reports of abuses were unclear, but when the War Weapons were seen in use the real stance of the Gorteshians was revealed once and for all."
(?) War Weapons the First
War_20Weapons "just for when the military runs out of real weapons" AKA "Just shoot me." [baconbrain, Jun 28 2005]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
I'm sorry, whats the invention? |
|
|
You should link up your inspirations. I can't find the
original. Maybe this should have been an anno under it. |
|
|
The idea, if I might paraphrase [not_only] is that there are a set of weapons (or rather a contract under which the weapons are sold), duly marked, that limit their legal usage to acts of defense only. |
|
|
The weapons described in the idea text were sold as such, however, shock-horror, were used as part of an aggressive civil uprising/heavy handed government suppression, etc... |
|
|
So we sell weapons to regimes without having to worry about them being used incorrectly, because it's already stipulated in the contract what legal usage entails. |
|
|
"In case of war, break glass.
Improper usage of this weapon will result in a maximum fine of $10,000" |
|
|
"Life will kill you." -- Warren Zevon |
|
| |