h a l f b a k e r yNo serviceable parts inside.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
This engine concept is derived from the six stroke steam hybrid engine concept [link], but should have more power when the engine is cool, and consume less water, and less fuel, when the engine is hot.
Each engine head contains the following components, all of which are computer controlled: A fuel
injector, a water injector, an air intake valve, an air exhaust valve, and a steam exhaust valve. There might be a spark plug or a glow plug.
There are also a number of high-speed electronic thermometers which measure cylinder temperature, head temperature, and water temperature at the injector.
Near the end of every engine cycle, a weighted average of the temperatures is calculated, and compared to a threshold.
Whenever the temperature is below the threshold (which will always be true when the engine is starting), the cylinder will be operated with a conventional four stroke Otto cycle.
Whenever the temp is above the threshold, the cylinder will operate as two stroke steam engine.
In steam mode, water is injected into the cylinder, flash-boiled into steam by the hot piston, cylinder walls, and valves, expanded to produce power, then expelled through the steam exhaust valve into the steam manifold, which leads to a condenser.
Furthermore, the amount of water injected is precisely controlled, so that the average torque of the two stroke cycle exactly equals the average torque of the most recent four stroke cycle.
When the engine is cold, the engine will run just like a normal four stroke engine. At higher temperatures, each four stroke cycle will be followed by one or more two stroke cycles; the number of two stroke cycles which take place between adjacent four stroke cycles will vary... hence the idea's name.
The advantages of this idea over a regular four stroke engine are the same as those of a six stroke steam hybrid, namely:
The engine isn't water-cooled, thus the engine block can be lightened by eliminating the coolant passages through it.
Each steam cycle produces power without consuming extra fuel.
In-cylinder hot spots are reduced or eliminated, which reduces engine knocking, and allows higher compression ratios.
There are also advantages over a regular six stroke steam hybrid:
Because the amount of power that must be produced by the steam expansion stroke is approximately one half of the power produced by the Otto-cycle combustion stroke minus the power consumed by the Otto-cycle compression stroke, we don't need very high steam pressures.
Since the maximum steam pressure is less than the maximum compressed air pressure, the variable stroke engine engine doesn't need to be any sturdier than a regular internal combustion engine.
Compare this with Bruce Crower's 6 stroke steam hybrid, whose prototype he built out of a diesel engine block, in order to contain the high steam pressures.
In addition, by injecting less water at the beginning of each steam expansion cycle, the steam pressure at the end of the expansion cycle is lowered, implying that water is being used more efficiently.
Last but not least, when the engine is warming up, we don't lose any power due to "coasting" through an unused fifth and six stroke; instead the engine runs as a normal 4 stroke engine.
Six Stroke Steam Hybrid
http://en.wikipedia...r_six-stroke_engine [goldbb, Apr 05 2010]
Preheated six stroke engine
Preheated_20six_20stroke_20engine [goldbb, Apr 05 2010]
Atkinson cycle
http://en.wikipedia...wiki/Atkinson_cycle [goldbb, Apr 08 2010]
Using a leaner than stoichiometric air/fuel mix
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_burn [goldbb, Apr 08 2010]
[link]
|
|
Although the engine I've described here gets the same amount of power, for a given amount of throttle, as a conventional engine, we *can*, if we choose, get even more power, by injecting more water... but to avoid losing efficiency, this should only be done when the engine is at full throttle already. And, we shouldn't inject so much water that the steam blows up the engine :) |
|
|
Oh, and of course, this concept could be easily combined with my "preheated six stroke engine" concept. |
|
|
//lightened by eliminating the coolant passages through
it.// Wait, what? You lighten it by removing holes?
As far as the rest of it goes, I don't understand* well enough
to have an opinion [] |
|
|
*My limited understanding -- not an issue with your writing. |
|
|
[+] but I don't understand why a six-stroke... a four-stroke with a long stroke could have water injected after the fuel has burned, and save complication |
|
|
[+] Intriguing and practical - what website am I on again? |
|
|
I'd love to see the study material for the smog techs who have to verify that it's running clean enough for California standards. |
|
|
mouseposture, I'm assuming that part of the metal of the engine block is needed for structural strength, and part to contain the coolant. Eliminating the coolant passages doesn't mean filling them in, but removing the non-structural metal that is part of the block solely to contain the coolant. |
|
|
FT, firstly, if water is injected after the fuel has burnt, then the entire exhaust system would need to be cooled if we wanted to recycle the water, requiring a really big cooling system. If the water is injected after the exhaust stroke, the steam can go through a separate exhaust valve and manifold, and then to a condenser, with a minimum of unwanted air, and thus a much smaller condenser/radiator. |
|
|
Secondly, by injecting water when the piston is at top dead center, we can expand the resulting steam by the cylinder's full expansion ratio. |
|
|
Thirdly, if water were injected halfway through the conventional expansion stroke, it wouldn't be able to reach the piston, which would be far away and quickly moving further away, and thus would be unable to cool the piston. |
|
|
Normzone, each cylinder which is using a four stroke Otto cycle will produce the same emissions as a conventional engine. Each cylinder which is using a two stroke steam cycle won't produce any emissions, since all the steam goes to the condenser, turns into water, and is re-used. |
|
|
All else being equal, the emissions per unit of fuel consumed will remain the same, but since the engine will be more fuel efficient, the emissions per unit of work produced will decrease. |
|
|
Fuel efficiency can be improved even more using the following two obvious methods: |
|
|
First, since we've gone through the trouble of making the valves completely computer controlled, we can use an Atkinson cycle when less than full power is wanted, and of course inject less fuel. To do this, we simply delay the closing of the air intake valve until beyond bottom dead center. |
|
|
Second, since we've got such a superb cooling method, we can use a lean air fuel ratio when the engine is lightly loaded, and stoichiometric when fully loaded. |
|
|
In fact, we can use the above two techniques to fully control how much power the engine's four stroke combustion cycles produce, and eliminate the throttle valve, thus eliminating pumping losses. |
|
|
whoa.. easy now fella.. the partial vacuum created by
the throttle valve is instrumental in converting
droplets of liquid fuel into vapor. Only vapor burns
quickly enough to contribute to the power stroke. |
|
|
Although, if you are recovering heat from the
combustion cycle to drive the steam cycle, then
maybe the heat from the 'second burn' isn't as
wasted as it would be otherwise. Still though. |
|
|
You're suggesting that an engine running with the throttle fully open won't produce any power. |
|
|
That doesn't sound quite right :) |
|
|
An engine with the throttle fully open still has some
pumping losses and maintains an amount of vacuum. |
|
|
I am suggesting that an internal-combustion engine
in which the fuel is delivered as a contiguous mass
will not produce much power. Even with the
throttle valve wide-open or absent, liquid fuel is still
converted to vapor, but the fuel-efficiency drops.
But that is not to say that vacuum is the only, or
best, way to convert fuel liquid to fuel vapor. |
|
|
I've often thought that waste heat is a squandered
resource in the ICE |
|
|
Sorry, I'd like to correct my anno: I meant to say throttling loss, not pumping loss. |
|
|
simonj, a company called "Transonic" is developing an engine that uses heat pipes to move heat from the exhaust valves to the fuel injectors, where that heat helps boil the fuel just prior to injection. Injection is just before top dead center, as on a diesel engine, but is able to work at a wider range of pressures, and a wider range of fuels. |
|
| |