h a l f b a k e r yWhat's a nice idea like yours doing in a place like this?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Worm Experiences Ltd. is proud to be opening the world's first
vacuum balloon jousting facility. Here, this new and exciting
technology is used for the benefit of daredevils and thrill-seekers
of all kinds.
At our huge 1.5 acre dome facility, jousters are weighed carefully.
A
large synthetic
rubber balloon is then filled with the exact amount
of
helium needed to offset the jouster's weight. Thus, when the
riders
are harnessed to their balloons, they float neutrally in space.
Before
two jousters are released into the air inside the dome, they are
each
handed an extremely long blunted lance and a battery-powered
vacuum cleaner.
When we ring the start buzzer, the two jousters (each fully
helmeted, goggled and padded) point their vacuum cleaners
upward
and turn them on. This propels them upwards through suction. As
there is no wind in the dome, the vacuum cleaners are the only
factors propelling the jousters around. Once both jousters are in
the
air, they attempt to use their lance to hit targets hanging beneath
the other jouster. There can be anywhere from one to ten targets,
and they fall off after they are hit. After all of a jouster's targets
have been hit, their harness disengages and they freefall into an
elastic safety net. The other jouster wins, and for their victory,
they
are awarded a helium party balloon to take home.
//A king of pedants is by definition male// No.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salic_law
The King of the Netherlands is sometimes a woman. [mouseposture, May 17 2010]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
Why have vacuum-cleaners *and* lances? Seems more
elegant to combine the two, as an extra-long vacuum-
cleaner pipe.
I would vote for this, except that "utilized" is a pet peeve of
mine. What have you got against "used?" |
|
| |
I see one problem. If the weight/bouyancy is so delicately balanced as to facilitate movement with a vacuum, then the loss of weight from the targets falling from the harnessed jouster will cause said jouster to get stuck on the ceiling. |
|
| |
Unless the strength of the vacuum is such that it could lift the ten targets. |
|
| |
[mouseposture]: You are the king of pedants. I'll change it.
Technically, though, "utilize" isn't strictly an exact synonym
of
"use." |
|
| |
[MikeD]: Hmm. I have a solution! Each target could be
neutrally buoyant with its own smaller balloon. |
|
| |
//king of pedants// Hah! You know how many people here
would dispute that title if I tried to claim it? Anyway, [+] |
|
| |
A king of pedants would be someone who controls pedants, by compiling dictionaries and other authoritative sources. These are team efforts and there is no "one source to rule them all". Encyclopedias are the only comprehensive sources and they are drawn from more authoritative but specific sources. |
|
| |
If there was a king of pedants, he would need total control over what was considered correct. Unfortunately, this power would probably corrupt him, tempting him to lie for his personal gain. No-one who had an unhealthy obsession with truth could abide such an abomination. |
|
| |
It's fortunate, then, that we are an agressive, hegemonising swarm, and already thoroughly corrupt(-ed). |
|
| |
[+] for the idea, and extra pastry if the //targets// are cats, or at the very least, cat-shaped. |
|
| |
// one source to rule them all // |
|
| |
Go on, finish the triplet ... are we taling "open source" here, or something darker and more evil, like MicroShit ? |
|
| |
[Bad_Jim], you are a sexist, and we claim our five dollars. |
|
| |
Would you like to go for racial and religious prejudice as well ? Points make prizes ... |
|
| |
[8th of 7], I deny sexism. A king of pedants is by definition male. You could have a queen of pedants though. Or actually you couldn't, for the same reason why you cannot have a king of pedants. I'm equally closed minded to either. |
|
| |
//are we taling "open source" here?// |
|
| |
I was talking about academic sources not source code, since I was discussing flesh and blood pedants, rather than the new kind of computerised pedant that won't let you post on a British forum until you have Americanised your spelling. |
|
| |
// I'm equally closed minded to either // |
|
| |
<Crowd of Peasants with Torches and Pitchforks> |
|
| |
</Crowd of Peasants with Torches and Pitchforks> |
|
| |
Ok I've capitalised it. Please call off the lynch mob. |
|
| |
No, you've done it now. Only blood can absolve the sin. Bring forth the Wicker Man ... |
|
| |
Although we do accept all major credit and charge cards ... |
|
| |
//These are team efforts and there is no "one source to rule
them all"//
Nowadays yes. By [Bad_Jim]'s definition*, Samuel Johnson
was
the king of pedants, and there'll never be another. |
|
| |
*An exceedingly pedantic definition, ca va sans dire. |
|
| |
So, can I maybe get a seat on the regency council of
pedants? |
|
| |
We suspect that "regency" will need a capital "R", actually ... and council will demand a capital "C", as they are both Proper Nouns in this context. |
|
| |
//can I maybe get a seat on the regency council of pedants?// |
|
| |
Potentially yes. Although my vote is currently going to [8th of 7] |
|
| |
"Like taking candy from a baby ...." |
|
| |
//Proper Nouns// is not a proper noun. Why are you
capitalizing it? This is some sort of trap, isn't it?
... and [8th_of_7] would require seats, plural. |
|
| |
// This is some sort of trap, isn't it? // |
|
| |
You have a nasty, suspicious mind. |
|
| |
You're quite correct. That doesn't mean that you still don't have a nasty, suspicious mind, though... |
|
| |
//You know how many people here would dispute that title
if I tried to claim it?//
We now have an answer to my original question: exactly
8/7ths people. |
|
| |
... which works out as 1.142857142857142857 1428571428571 of the population of the HB. |
|
| |
(By the way, isn't it sooo cute the way that fraction recurs ? Maybe you could deduce something from that .... ) |
|
| |
If annyone DARES say "Who ate all the pi's", well, just don't, OK ? |
|
| |