h a l f b a k e r yYou want a piece of this?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I love it. I am really looking forward to the 1.2 upgrade with the UnPollock filter. |
|
|
'The Impressionism-Sharpening Filter' |
|
|
And, of course, an *oppressor* to take care of dadaism. |
|
|
If you applied the uncubist filter to all your jazz albums, would they all end up sounding like Bing Crosby or Simon and Garfunkel? |
|
|
If you squirt eucalyptus oil into your eyes and squint through the tears, everything looks like a Monet. |
|
|
And if you beat everyone else's faces to a pulp with an iron skillet, they look like a Francis Bacon. |
|
|
I like that idea zen tom - you could also surgically convert
them into Hieronymus Boschs - nip - tuck - run..... as for
the Jazz albums, I'm sure that the Teddy Bear's picnic is
lurking somewhere in the wild extremes of Ornette
Coleman. |
|
|
The thing that really annoys me about Cubism is its name. What's it got to do with cubes? Nothing! It should be looking-at-everything from-all-angles at-onceism, or exploded-technical drawing-ism, just something that gives you a bit of a clue. Like Dadaism, I suppose... |
|
|
Blame Cézanne for it was his "unstable" renderings that Picasso, Braque and Gris first sought to solidify through early Cubism before it took off on its own path. |
|
|
"The origin of the name Cubism is disputed: it is sometimes attributed to an ill-tempered outburst of Matisse against Braque's work, and sometimes to the art critic Louis de Vauxcelles describing one of Braque's paintings as reducing everything to cubes."
--- virtualartroom.com |
|
|
Maybe, because cubist work is essentially faceted--composed of facets--the style should have been known as Facetious. ;-) |
|
|
How about a Cubister, or a Cuber? A
program that takes any normal image and
turns it into a Cubist masterpiece? |
|
|
I would like to try it on normal images and see what it pastes together. |
|
|
//protagonists// exponents, Shirley? |
|
| |