h a l f b a k e r yJust add oughta.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
I like the idea mostly because it becomes a step
towards self driving cars. I would argue that the
pavement loop isn't required, as a directional
transmitter pointing out and down from the light
itself should also serve. |
|
|
//a directional transmitter pointing out and down from the
light// |
|
|
I had considered that, but was concerned that it might not
be as reliablethe signal path might be blocked by a large
truck, say. Also, with two lights in close proximity, the
signals might be prone to interfering with each other. |
|
|
I would recommend a bit of other data be included
with that signal: how many seconds remaining until
the light changes. Then, if this data was received by
a car approaching the light, the driver (or future
autopilot) could be informed on what speed to travel
at, to arrive when the light becomes green. |
|
|
Hmm, thinking about the loop, why not just make a bigger loop and get the cars to circle in that until the light turns green? |
|
|
How about using different wavelengths of visible light to represent the different signal states? |
|
|
Would you not be able to transmit on the loop that's
already in the road for vehicle detection? |
|
|
It doesn't go back far enough, unfortunately. The
driver wouldn't be able to find out what the state of
the light is until it's potentially too late to do anything
about it. |
|
|
// This way, traffic signals can become accessible to the blind. // |
|
|
Redundant ... there is already a perfectly useable audio indication signal. It's the sound of metal being crushed, torn and twisted - it's very distictive, you can't miss it ... |
|
| |