h a l f b a k e r y"Put it on a plate, son. You'll enjoy it more."
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
This is basically a normal turbojet engine, but where you would have the combustion tubes / chambers, there would be a nozzle spraying high pressure steam. A boiler in the middle of the plane provides this steam to individual engines.
A steam rocket might be simpler. Instead of mixing the steam
with air using turbines, just have a big nozzle out the back.
Useful for any writers of steam-punk fiction.
Jet-Powered Oil Lamp
Jet-Powered_20Oil_20Lamp
Similar idea [discontinuuity, Dec 09 2005]
Steam Powered Jet Engine
http://www.history....hero/section50.html
Similar idea. [angel, Dec 09 2005]
[link]
|
| |
I dunno, you'll need a lot of water, and since water is heavy, flight could be a bit of a problem. |
|
| |
Somehow I could picture this on the Wild Wild West. |
|
| |
You could use a fuel burning turbine to heat the water. |
|
| |
And how about stewardesses with big shovels, pushing the coal through path towards the boiler.
1st class passengers are seated away from coal storage and boiler. |
|
| |
Steam rockets have been written about and done. |
|
| |
It used to be done to use water boost on a jet engine, for take-off only. |
|
| |
There is no point in compressing the air, and no point in having a turbine, if combustion is not taking place. |
|
| |
The steam would be spinning a small, high-pressure, high speed turbine which would in turn spin a larger ducted fan to move the air. It wouldn't be a jet engine per se, since there would be no combustion, but there would still be expanding gasses and fans pushing the engine forwards. |
|
| |
But you would need some kind of combustion to heat the water to make steam. So then if you already are burning something, why not heat the air instead of water, like a normal jet engine, since air is already surrounding the jet and its lighter than water. Ergo, a normal jet engine would be better and your idea is just a little too inefficient, though I do like the concept behind it. A bun for the effort. |
|
| |