h a l f b a k e r yactual product may differ from illustration
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
All news sources should be required to display one statistic at the top of each news report: the likelihood of the average person being personally affected by the subject of the report. Subjects would be coarse bins and open to tweaking from time to time.
The statistic could be presented as a number,
pictograph, icon, color band, etc.
"Doctors Say Heart Disease Endemic" - 75%
"South-side Break-ins Continue" - 5%
"Child Falls Down Well" - 0.002%
"Shark Decapitates Katana-wielding Lingerie Model" - 0.000001%
As concerns political debate...
Nielsen_20Gullibility_20Ratings
spot on. [FlyingToaster, May 27 2014]
[link]
|
| |
" Shark Decapitates Katana-wielding Lingerie Model " |
|
| |
Edit: Maybe she did train under my sword mentor...he was not a good teacher but he was an excellent fighter... |
|
| |
On the right track but not the right metric in my
opinion. "Doctors say you need air to breathe"
100% isn't very useful news. News is something
new, that hasn't happened before. Therefore the
metric should be |
|
| |
NewsMetric = LikelihoodItAffectsYou *
UnexpectedOccurenceFactor |
|
| |
That way "Shark Decapitates Katana Wielding
Lingerie Model" might actually be breaking news if
it happens couple of times in a row (once: maybe,
couple of times: extremely unexpected) |
|
| |
... even more so if the same Katana Wielding
Lingerie model was involved in both incidents.
Now that's newsworthy! |
|
| |