h a l f b a k e r yAlmost as great as sliced bread.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I believe that Scotland still has 3 possible trial outcomes,
ie
"guilty", "not guilty" and "not proven".
Just to get this stuff line up, courts south of the
border
can have "guilty", "not guilty" and "It seemed like a good
idea at
the time'".
I still think a verdict of "guilty as weasel
in a hen house"
should be on the books, but that's just my opinion.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
As in many countries, in fact there are just two verdicts in the UK; "Guilty", and "I am very wealthy and have influential friends". |
|
| |
'We the jury got to the truth and decided...', ' We the jury decided..' and 'Sorry, the court got us, the jury, nowhere near the truth'. |
|
| |
^ (my) Pedant alert "Whoop whoop whoop" all doors go on
into lockdown etc. |
|
| |
"Differences Between Vegan and Vegetarian. ... Some
vegetarians also exclude dairy, some don't, and some may
consume eggs." |
|
| |
Ergo, even a vegetarian weasel might eat the eggs, so
committing poultrycide.. |
|
| |
I believe that the UK government have gone quite a long way down the road to standardising trial outcomes along the lines of 8th's description.
The legal aid program has been so starved of resources in the last decade that the few remaining legal aid funded defense lawyers barely have enough time to learn their clients name or what it is they are supposed to have done, or even where & when the trial is being held in many instances, before they have to move on to the next case.
As to the idea, I am against it. It is up to the state to prove that you have committed a crime. If they can't manage that one, simple thing then they shouldn't have taken it to trial in the first place & wasted taxpayers money.
Thinking about that a bit more, I wonder if we can pep up the entertainment & excitement value of the criminal justice system by having trials where the outcome is always that somebody is guilty of something & gets shipped off to prison to do 10 years hard labour. Either the defendant was guilty of the crime or the prosecution was guilty of incompetence &/or wasting the nations resources. That should make them nice & 'edgy'! |
|
| |