h a l f b a k e r yBusiness Failure Incubator
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Please log in.
Before you can vote, you need to register.
Please log in or create an account.
|
60 years after the invention of COBOL, I think it's permissible
for compiler and exception handling folks to throw in the
variables passed on the stack when generating a stack trace
such that extra logging to capture it was not necessary.
[link]
|
| |
No first-hand experience, but my dad wrote RAE’s
Blue Streak dynamics modelling and Dounreay’s
thermodynamics modelling in COBOL.
So, no, I don’t understand, but yes, impressed by
whatever it means. |
|
| |
Just had to use the ALTER statement, didn't you. |
|
| |
Anyways, it's CO"we don't need no stinkeen' local variables'BOL, so what's the problem ; your mother never teach you how to read a core dump ? |
|
| |