h a l f b a k e r yIf you can read this you are not following too closely.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
I am following on largely from "Halfbakery Food 1-3".
We shall genetically engineer animals such as cows to contain lumps of potato, and scattered peas embedded in various chunky muscles, and to have another part to their bodies - such as a hump - containing pudding ingredients, like rhubarb, and
perhaps custard. Or prunes, or Angel Delight, or even Jacob's Orange Clubs.
Abattoir processes shall revolve around the meal table. And udders could make beer or pop etc. And hair follicles shall sprinkle icing sugar, for instance. And bladders might have soup.
No more costly arable crops or chemical synthesis of puddings; let the cow do the work and take the credit, for example.
A one ton cow could quite likely feed about thirty people three courses, drinks and - if we're quite clever - wafer thin after-dinner mints.
Scientists cross pigs with spinach
http://news.bbc.co....1780000/1780541.stm
At last my halfbakedness begins to crisp! Oh the delight as pigs bear spinach in their loins! [eehen, Jan 25 2002, last modified Oct 21 2004]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Destination URL.
E.g., https://www.coffee.com/
Description (displayed with the short name and URL.)
|
| |
It would be much easier to genetically manipulate plants to produce meaty bits- like a potato with chunks of beef in it or built-in butter pats. Or a carrot with a bacon skin. Would appeal to those of us who dislike the abbatoir/killing animals thing altogether. There are plants already in existence with animal DNA in them, and they're in stores and being eaten in the US...why not make green beans that taste like fried chicken? Or shiitakes that make a savory venison gravy... |
|
| |
Poor old cows seem to get a lot of stick on this website. Why not pick on something else, like a sheep for a change? |
|
| |
It's indeed quite right what you say. |
|
| |
Now that the Humane Gnome Project is completed, there's not much reason against a massive, massive corn-on-the-cob, which - instead of corn - is made of a big-dirty fry-up: Smokey Bacon, Black Pudding, 2xFried Slice, Heinz Baked Beans, Plumstead Tomatoes, Pork Walls of Sausage, Fried Egg, Mushrooms and Spirit Level. |
|
| |
Just think of Nebraska these days! |
|
| |
Yuck! You're eating a cheeseburger and all of a sudden, you come across a colony of peas! Disgusting. |
|
| |
And them GE peas protest loudly about being munched too! |
|
| |
It's bad enough that we kill animals for meat, but for vegetables? That's just too much. |
|
| |
Everything kills to eat...most plants don't kill directly, but they still live on death. |
|
| |
Photosynthesis can turn water and carbon dioxide and a few minerals and sunlight into oxygen and biomass. No death required. |
|
| |
It had to start somewhere, after all. |
|
| |
There are far worse things than killing animals in order to eat them. |
|
| |
[egnor]: No death required? What about the eventual death of the plant? |
|
| |
Anybody ever wonder how many budding lifeforms might have been wiped out in the supernovae that created the elements for our solar system? |
|
| |
Venus flytraps? Pitcher plants? |
|
| |
Where does fertilizer come from? DEAD leaves, DEAD plants, DEAD animals, post-consumer food that was killed by the consumer. |
|
| |
Everything lives on death. Something has to die so that something else can live. Soil is not sand; plants can't live in sand on their own. |
|
| |
Many plants benefit from other dead, and yes, plants die, but that's not "living on death". |
|
| |
I just wanted to point out that not *all* plants in all circumstances require something else to have died first. Lichen can colonize a bare rock. |
|
| |
And I thought fertilizer was mostly synthetic these days... |
|
| |
Now that we're so fly with the genetic tinkery, couldn't we create dead farm animals that grow live meat? Then we don't have to kill them - they're already dead - we just harvest the flesh regularly. You could even keep a dead specimen in your fridge. Mince on tap. Or maybe it could operate more like a vending machine - we could engineer sheep that have coin slots - and hey presto!, fresh sweetbread whenever you need it. |
|
| |
I have heard of ideas to grow brainless livestock that are fed through tubes until "harvested." I can't remember what the objection to this was apart it being damned creepy. |
|
| |
I didn't necessarily mean brainless. That would be awful. We still want them to be happy, for the sake of the meat quality and the colour of the egg yolks, etc. We just tamper with the gene that gives them a soul. |
|
| |
And we could genetically engineer the embedded vegetables to generate electricity - much like stingray things and killer thunderstorms already do, but in a quality way, such that the peas and potato-chunks etc. growing within cows' etc.'s muscles would give said animals a nice warm glow, or alternatively sexual frisson. |
|
| |
That way ensuring happiness lies. |
|
| |
...brainless livestock that are fed through tubes until "harvested." ...Doesn't sound creepy, sounds rather like our government.... |
|
| |
Is that what was with all those brainless babies born down in Texas? More tractable agricultural labor? |
|
| |
We're in Hitch-Hikers' Guide territory again here. Anyone remember the cow-like thing that actually WANTED to be eaten? |
|
| |
I never cease to be amazed by the wonders of genetic engineering. |
|
| |
you do realize that this idea of animal/plant comonation was on a dilbert episode where he created the tomeato and created pandimonium? |
|
| |