h a l f b a k e r yExpensive, difficult, slightly dangerous, not particularly effective... I'm on a roll.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
For the do-it yourselfer (and professionals).
Like a big spin on oil filter only it's the entire oil pan with integrated filter.
Purchase the pan-filter unit prefilled with oil.
Spin off the used unit.
Remove the snap on plastic lid from the new one.
Snap the plastic lid on the old unit.
Spin
the fresh unit on the engine.
Return old pan to recycling location within auto parts store.
Yeah, yeah. I know there are issues:
- Engineering car's structure to allow room for the pan to drop out: no big deal, RayfordSteele can always use the work
- Spinning the thing off without dropping it: be careful
- Standarization: have you looked at the plethora of oil filters in the parts store? Now would be a good time to begin reducing the number of choices.
- Indexing to ensure the baffling is in the right position to keep oil near the pump pickup while turning, accelerating: tricky, this one.
- etc.
- etc.
- etc.
If the pan is engineered to be of sufficiently low profile, a semi-automated floor jack type device could be used to roll under the car, automatically remove the pan and roll back out. All without jacking up the car and all without me getting dirty oil in my eye.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
Lube *needs* to be added at the top end, doesn't it? What if the threads get stripped? |
|
| |
Yes, I guess the gasket would have a light coating of grease from the factory for a no-oil-on-hands install. |
|
| |
If the threads get stripped, that'd be no different than the same problem with spin on oil filters (no fun by the way). If it's the threaded part on the engine, replace it. If it's the threaded part of the filter (now pan) replace it. |
|
| |
I’m Popeye the sailor man.
Just switched a spin on oil can.
It’s unsoiled like my goyl
Whose name’s Olive Oyle.
A whole + from another œ fan. |
|
| |
I mean, *top end* of the engine. |
|
| |
Oh, you mean "lube *needs* to be added at the top end". Why didn't you just say that? I know of no reason that lube needs to be added from the top end. It all gets sucked out of the oil pan no matter how it gets in to the pan. After your car is parked a while, there's no oil in the top end. After pouring in the oil for an oil change, it all just runs down in to the pan in short order. (Speaking generally about run of the mill production cars that I'm familiar with.) |
|
| |
Maybe you're thinking of something that I'm not. |
|
| |
Hmmm. Aren't you making a regularly replaced part (oil filter) more expensive, increasing the running costs of the car? |
|
| |
This is an outstanding idea. The only problems I see are:
1) Those people who, for what ever reason, want to put additives in their oil, and
2) Standardization. |
|
| |
The first one could be solved by offering un-oiled filter/pans. The second would probably work out with market forces. |
|
| |
Should this be forwarded to Auto makers? Probably. |
|
| |
s3tf- this needn't increase the cost much. as the pan is being returned and presumeably cleaned and refilled by the auto-parts store the only cost should be in replacing the integral filter. this should be cheaper then a normal filter due to the necessary standardisation giving a larger market. it may even make this process cheaper than the current one, although that would probably represent a better profit margin, rather than a reduction in price. |
|
| |