h a l f b a k e r yPlease listen carefully, as our opinions have changed.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Speed shapes
... or an idea to reduce eye-strain and fuel consumption. | |
On an unfamiliar road, approaching a speed limit sign. It's a red circle with black figures in it, so it's not a 'national speed limit' sign (UK). Does it say 50? 30? 40? 20? I'm still too far away to tell.
Or maybe it's just time I had my eyes tested.
I can brake early, in anticipation of a 30mph
zone; lose momentum; reach what then turns out to be a 50mph zone and have to re-accelerate, wasting petrol.
Or, I can assume it's a "50" sign; realise too late that the sign in fact says "20", and have to brake late & hard. Oooh, dangerous. And bad for your brakes.
Now, if speed limit signs were different shapes, they could be read at more of a distance ... driver anticipates required accel-/deceleration earlier, safer braking, more economical use of fuel, traffic moves more smoothly.
Bosh.
I propose the 30pmh sign remains a circle. A stretched ellipse (with the long axis on the vertical) for 40pmh, some kind of rhomboid for 50, and a 5-pointed star for 20mph zones past schools and residential areas.
Of course, it won't help the swine who choose to do 80 past my house (40mph limit). They'll get theirs. I've seen the road-death figures for this county.
A measure of international standardisation in sign-shape would be welcome, and perhaps some commonality between signs in mph and their approximate equivalents in km/h.
We've been here before, I know, and people have objected about the expense of having to mass-change thousands of road signs. Well .... yeah.
Halfbaked Estates
Halfbaked_20Estates [normzone, Jun 09 2006]
A "2-sided" shape?
http://en.wikipedia.../wiki/Vesica_piscis Vesica piscis [BJS, Jun 10 2006]
BBC News 15th June '06
http://news.bbc.co..../london/5082426.stm Cameras catch 20mph zone speeders [bibliotaphist, Jun 16 2006]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
|
I couldn't think of a good title; and then I could. Well, good-ish. It's very hot, you see. |
|
|
+ I like it and I like boysparks's title! I don't like having a sign to tell me about an approaching sign, too many signs. I like the different shapes denoting the speed. (Not that I would always adhere to the limit, but it's nice to know what one *should* be doing.) |
|
|
If you have a two sided sign, would it shaped like a two dimensional American football? |
|
|
>If you have a two sided sign, would it be american football shaped? |
|
|
No, it would be rugby ball shaped |
|
|
Why not go for speed sizes? The more you need to restrict your speed, the larger the sign would be so it could be seen further away. If only a slight speed modification is required, it can be a smaller sign. |
|
|
These would be ideal for Halfbaked Estates [link]. |
|
|
+1 for a great start to hb life... |
|
|
Excellent title, [boysparks] ... I'm afraid I have far too literal a mind to come up with these 3-for't'price-of-1 swiss-roll titles. |
|
|
As a long-time lurker i'th'baakery, it's lovely to see how this vernacular for idea titles has grown up: not straight-forward puns; rarely referring explicitly to the product in question; more of an oblique reference which hints at worlds unseen. |
|
|
I wonder, [boysparks] and others: are you all crossword fans? |
|
|
Stop it, please, you're killing me. |
|
|
Why not just make the first digit much larger? e.g. 5o or: |
|
|
. ___
.|
. '''''''''| 0
. ''''''''''
|
|
|
I like the idea, but most people (here in the US) drive according to prevailing traffic speeds. Speed limits are more suggestions these days, it seems. |
|
|
At any rate, this gives them new and more interesting signs to ignore. [+] |
|
|
Um, shouldn't you be wearing your glasses while you drive? |
|
|
I just prefer to drive the same speed as everyone around me. I figure (incorrectly) that is good enough. |
|
|
What, not "amphetamine-in-a-biskit"? |
|
|
/Speed limits are more suggestions these days, it seems/ |
|
|
Not in the UK, [shapu] ... see link. |
|
| |