h a l f b a k e r yAmbivalent? Are you sure?
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
|
link added to a comprehesive car signalling system. However, the car which hit you should have been far enough behind you to be able to brake when the driver saw your brake lights come on. If (s)he wasn't far enough away or wasn't paying attention to your lights, the driver is at fault. If your lights don't work, you are (partly) at fault. Extra tooting noise would not have helped in either of those scenarios (scenaria?) |
|
|
According to the highway code you "MUST NOT" use your horn between 11.30 pm and 7.00 am which would leave a 7 and half hour hole in your suggestion. I would recommend you get a faster car so you can floor it inbetween bumps, thus when you get to the next speed bump you're a safe distance from the car behind (alternatively tie a good number of pillows to the back of the car and one to the steering wheel). |
|
|
PJ - Point well made but... the highway code is only written suggestions. There are no 'laws' dictating when and were your 'horn' may be used. A new\faster car is out of the question my classic has sentimental values no other car could replace.
Lewisgirl - For the record it was a she and im conviced that a short sharp toot would have alerted her of the hazard i was manoeuvring over. |
|
|
Wooter, get a motorbike and go around the speed bumps. |
|
|
There's a "Speed Hump" sign an alley heading south (1200 block) off Wilshire between 4th and 5th street towards Santa Monica Post Office. Yet there's no Speed Hump. |
|
|
Thumbwax, the sign is missing a comma and is intended as an imperative. |
|
|
Also known as a "quickie?" <g> |
|
| |