h a l f b a k e r yBuy 1/4, get 1/4 free.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
| |
With Hubble Telescope-like aiming, the rays could be
directly sent to a ground station. |
|
| |
For a monthly fee, could this be set up like Satellite Teevee? So, as long as you're a subscriber, the sun rays are directed into your house to heat up the water heater, the stove, that little heating pad people buy for arthritic dogs, etc. Whatever; all that messy distribution minutia can come later! Sounds enormously dangerous and exceedingly unlikely! Proceed directly to the bakery and get to baking, [kevin] old chum, a chilly world awaits your brainchild. Bun! [+] |
|
| |
Oh, one more thing; might this invention be used in defensive or offensive military applications, such as burning down sushi restaurants suspected of harboring evil-doers? Nevermind. I'm already sold. |
|
| |
I'd suggest the limiting factor would be the capability of your collector, not your reflector. An earth orbital concentrating satellite is already reaching the limit of what wer can handle with current technology. |
|
| |
Also, like orbital collectors, the economic limiting step is transitioning the power down to the ground. Directly beaming sunlight will bloom like crazy, and be dependent on weather conditions. Microwave beaming or similar is being heavily researched, but no viable solution exists yet. |
|
| |
//low orbit around the sun// How do you propose
to do that? How you expect to synchronize the solar
satellite's ray with the earth satellite's? Is an earth
orbit that stays geosynchronous with the sun even
possible? |
|
| |
Well ... not a true "orbit". If you're prepared to run your propuslion system continuously, you can manage a sort of station keeping ... but basically, no. Not a "free fall" orbit per se. |
|
| |
You could do an array of satellites around the sun--you'd pretty much have to, because one, as described, just ain't gonna work. And an array isn't much better, really. |
|
| |
A mirror satellite will be behind the sun for some of its orbit, on the far side of its orbit, at a bad angle for reflecting, or between the earth and the sun and unable to reflect, almost all of the time. |
|
| |
Plus, a reflector close to the sun will see the solar disk as much larger, making it harder to get all the light focussed down into a tight beam. |
|
| |
Also, consider this: A workable version of this idea will increase the amount of solar energy hitting the earth. It may be solar power, but it will contribute to global warming. |
|
| |
HB-wise, this idea's title is really generic. It could be the name of a category. |
|
| |
The sun is 8 light minutes away, which means that, once
someone on earth started to feel a little warm, it would be
16 minutes before they could do anything about it. |
|
| |
As far as the oribts themselves, that's fairly simple. Polar orbits for both satellites, precessing once per year. It would require a little bit of station keeping, but only a little. The tracking and aiming software is non trivial, as an error of 1.15e-9 degrees is equivalent to a 10 ft misalignment. |
|
| |
Another point to consider -- although the distance from the sun to the reflector orbiting it will be nearly constant, the distance from that reflector to the earth-orbiting concentrator will be constantly varying. |
|
| |
This means that to have an ellipsoidal reflector that focuses the sun's light on the collector requires continuously changing the reflector's geometry. |
|
| |