h a l f b a k e r yThese statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
Currently, genetic engineering is being used by commercial tree farmers to make 'better' wood -- burns hotter, has fewer knots, grows faster in poorer soil with less disease, sterility (so it won't change ecosystems), and so on.
However, I propose we take one particular feat of genetic engineering
-- namely, to have fewer knots -- and put it in reverse; to have *more* knots.
While growing, it would not grow up straight, but rather creepy, curling about. As an additional bonus, it'd be easier to climb.
When chopped down, the extra knots would make it burn irregularly, 'popping' rather more often. Just the right kind to cuddle before, and fun for the kids.
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
I thought knots had to do with the former presence of limbs? |
|
| |
i wonder if more limbs means more wood, or its all relative to the overall combined mass - do trees with more limbs thus have less trunk girth? |
|
| |
I think so... at least it's that way with elephants. |
|
| |