h a l f b a k e r yBirth of a Notion.
add, search, annotate, link, view, overview, recent, by name, random
news, help, about, links, report a problem
browse anonymously,
or get an account
and write.
register,
|
|
|
As you drive down the freeway, a few miles before the smart billboard, receivers pick up data about you from a factory-installed transmitter, which you accepted as part of the free car deal (subsidized by the advertisers' fees to be included in the database). The smart billboard analyzes the owners'
purchase history data from all the cars it has collected, and the highest scoring ad (corresponding to the car owners' purchase data) in the system's database gets displayed.
Call the system CarsZero. To ensure the advertisers that car owners are legitimately using the system, the transmitter can transmit a code unique to you every time your data is used in billboard ad selection. If your code never gets used (or gets used rarely), the car companies will charge you a sliding fee.
Interactive billboards @ idea-a-day.com
http://www.idea-a-d...playDate=10/05/2001
Similar idea. Mobile phones instead of cars, no freebies. [egnor, May 01 2001, last modified Oct 04 2004]
Billboards that target based on your radio station
http://slashdot.org...=149&tid=158&tid=99
[davinic, Oct 04 2004]
Please log in.
If you're not logged in,
you can see what this page
looks like, but you will
not be able to add anything.
Annotation:
|
| |
No, I am aware of the free billboard car. This is very different, and better. I am not willing to drive around looking like that. Most people aren't. This is directed advertising. And I would not be an eyesore on the road. |
|
| |
hmm... this sounds like a WIBNI we could get free cars in exchange for targeted advertising, especially considering that it is not presently possible given any current implementation of the mentioned technologies. The question is, if everybody has such a free car, we would each have to belong to many different marketable subsets of Their data, so that when multiple drivers are in close proximity, it would choose the ad for the largest-percentage common factor for all the drivers in viewing range. |
|
| |
'course, I'd drive a free car anyday, especially if I could just *not look* at the stupid billboards (and alternatively, maybe concentrate on driving ;) What about fleet maintenance? I'd expect that these advertisers wouldn't presume to stick me with a lemon, because that would preclude inundating me with Their advertising. Right? err.. |
|
| |
This is certainly bakable with current technology. A transmitter transmits a code (unique to you) to a receiver on the side of the road that accesses a purchase history database using that code as the key. Surely you are aware that advertisers can access your purchase history by purchasing it from vendors you have bought stuff from. That forms the marketable data subset. And yes, multiple drivers in the proximity of the billboard contribute to the current target market scores, and the highest matching ad gets the spot. |
|
| |
Of course the cars would not be BMWs or Lexuses (Lexi?). Just inexpensive economy cars. All other factors of car ownership would remain -- registration and licensing, warranties and maintenance plans. You could limit everyone to one free car every two years. I think this would work. And yes, the advertisers would be interested in making sure the cars were usable to get the return on their investments. |
|
| |
Not bad, but what if you frequently use products/services you don't want the general populous to know about? |
|
| |
The yearly lease cost for a cheap
car is something like $1500 yearly
(I'm ignoring the down payment).
That's a really cheap car, mind
you -- a new Honda Civic leases
for over twice that. |
|
| |
The CPM (cost per thousand
impressions) of outdoor
advertising is usually around $2.
If we assume that your targeted
advertising is *ten times* more
valuable (which is very generous
compared to the differential value
of targeted advertising in other
venues), that's a CPM of $20, or 2
cents per impression. |
|
| |
That means, supply a free car,
you'll need each individual driver
to personally see 75,000 targeted
ad impressions yearly, or 250
daily. If you spend 40 minutes
commuting, that's one targeted ad
every ten seconds. The sheer
quantity of ads alone will lower
their price considerably (after
seeing 125 ads on your drive home
for ten seconds each, how much are
you going to remember?). |
|
| |
Now, consider the capital cost of
the advertising infrastructure
needed to completely cover
someone's commute this way.
Consider that you can't share the
infrastructure with multiple
drivers at the same time. |
|
| |
Do you see where I'm going here? |
|
| |
It's very, very, very hard to
support any endeavor with serious
per-user costs with advertising
revenue. Ad-supported Web sites
are collapsing left and right, and
you want to give each user a *free
car*? What do you think this is,
1999? |
|
| |
This is actually very feasible, technology-wise that is. We already have something similar here in Boston, just implemented differently. Some of the cabs in town have electronic billboards on top of them, and the ads change depending on what part of town they're in. So the same cab can advertise the latest musical when it's in the theater district, a temp agency when it's in the financial district, and the local watering hole when it's over by the colleges. |
|
| |
It seems to me that it shouldn't be that difficult to run the system in reverse, i.e. keep the billboards stationary and move the transmitters around. And if it means that I get a free car, all the better... |
|
| |
I remember when People played with games as opposed to the other way around. Why not just get an implant in your skull and get it overwith. You'll be crossmarketable no matter what the circumstance. |
|
| |
Stop clouding the issue with facts and figures, egnor. |
|
| |
If we can't give them away for free, then how about a drastically reduced rate? Tell you what, since you're so fond of crunching those numbers, why don't you sit down and figure out what the absolute cheapest they could get a reasonable ROI on, OK? Let's make these assumptions: |
|
| |
Assume we can get, say, 55% target hits every ad. You figure on a busy freeway (not in Hawaii) figure out the amount of cars that 55% target hits represents. Now, what % of the target hits tend to turn into actual revenue? Generously 5% (including impulse non-taarget hits)? OK. Assume a driver won't get overstimulated at 10 billboards per mile. How much revenue does that represent? Assuming every car is one of our CarsZero cars, what is the lowest they could sell them for and still justify their ROI? I think people would still go for it. What do you think? |
|
| |
To quote PeeWee Herman "Marry it already". If you like this so much - bake it. But don't use egnor as a punching bag AND a source of figures. |
|
| |
Oh. You mean... do it myself??? Heavens! |
|
| |
I make no such assumptions. Just as the existence of NetZero doesn't mean there's no more AOL. Unfortunately. |
|
| |
http://www.wrapcars.com
allegedly pays up to $400 a month for drivers who agree to have their cars wrapped in vinyl advertising. alternatively they will supply the driver with a new car (in that case no monthly payment). The contract is for 2 years or less- I don't know what happens after that, I don't think one can assume they automatically renew the contract. |
|
| |
[whlanteigne], please use the link feature, up the page, and on the left. |
|
| |